期刊文献+

无痛胃肠镜检查中不良事件及其相关影响因素 被引量:42

Analysis of adverse events and related influencing factors in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无痛胃肠镜检查中不良事件及其相关影响因素。方法采用电子问卷形式在新青年麻醉论坛和medical group上发布问卷调查,选取的调查时间与人群范围为2021年3月至5月在华中地区各级含消化内镜中心的综合医院内从事无痛胃肠镜检查工作≥12个月的麻醉医生和内镜医生。结果全身麻醉下行无痛胃肠镜检查中发生低血压(P<0.001)、心律失常(P=0.034)、氧饱和度<85%(P<0.001)、呼吸抑制(P<0.001)和反流误吸(P=0.023)的比例明显高于清醒镇静下行无痛胃肠镜检查。在这些高发不良事件中,患者高龄(OR=1.13,95%CI:0.03~1.61,P=0.009)、肥胖(OR=10.93,95%CI:1.30~92.07,P=0.028)、合并症多(OR=4.14,95%CI:1.28~13.40,P=0.018)、内镜医生操作不熟练(OR=6.23,95%CI:1.55~24.95,P=0.010)及麻醉医生给药剂量大(OR=2.77,95%CI:1.03~7.43,P=0.043)会显著增加不良事件发生频率,而麻醉医生给药缓慢(OR=0.22,95%CI:0.07~0.63,P=0.005)会降低不良事件发生频率。结论尽管应用异丙酚镇静全身麻醉下行无痛胃肠镜检查的风险较清醒镇静更大,但该方法具有检查后恢复迅速及检查中操作中断率和误诊率低等优点,可确保无痛胃肠镜检查的安全性及舒适性。 Objective To explore the adverse events and related factors during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.Methods The survey was completed on New Youth Anesthesia Forum and Medical Group in the form of an electronic questionnaire,and was administered to anesthesiologists and endoscopists who had been engaged in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy for≥12 months in general hospitals,including digestive endoscopy centers in central China between March 2021 and May 2021.Results The proportion of hypotension(P<0.001),arrhythmia(P=0.034),oxygen saturation<85%(P<0.001),respiratory depression(P<0.001),and reflux aspiration(P=0.023)that occurred during painless gastrointestinal endoscopy under general anesthesia was significantly higher than that of painless gastrointestinal endoscopy under conscious sedation.For frequently occurring adverse events,older age(OR=1.13,95%CI:0.03-1.61,P=0.009),obesity(OR=10.93,95%CI:1.30-92.07,P=0.028),additional comorbidities(OR=4.14,95%CI:1.28-13.40,P=0.018),an unskilled endoscopist(OR=6.23,95%CI:1.55-24.95,P=0.010),or high dose of anesthetics(OR=2.77,95%CI:1.03-7.43,P=0.043)significantly increased the frequency of adverse events,while slow administration of anesthetics reduced the frequency of adverse events.Conclusion Although the use of general anesthesia under propofol sedation has a greater potential risk than conscious sedation,the comfort that patients feel,rapid recovery after surgery,and low probability of interruption or failure during the operation cannot be ignored.Therefore,anesthesiologists must ensure the safety of the operation and provide further expertise in the immediate management of the respiratory system to better protect the safety of their patients.
作者 黄昕 宋比佳 罗慢 顾祥一 朱俊超 HUANG Xin;SONG Bijia;LUO Man;GU Xiangyi;ZHU Junchao(Department of Anesthesiology,Wuhan Union Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,Chin;Department of Anesthesiology,Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China)
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期136-139,144,共5页 Journal of China Medical University
基金 辽宁省重点研发计划(2020JH2/10300123)。
关键词 无痛胃肠镜 全身麻醉 清醒镇静 异丙酚 不良事件 painless gastrointestinal endoscopy general anesthesia conscious sedation propofol adverse events
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Olsen AH, Parkin DM, Sasieni P. Cancer mortality in the UnitedKingdom: projections to the year 2025. Br J Cancer 2008; 99:1549-1554 [PMID: 18854832 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604710].
  • 2Paterson WG, Depew WT, Paré P, Petrunia D, Switzer C,Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Daniels S. Canadian consensus onmedically acceptable wait times for digestive health care. Can JGastroenterol 2006; 20: 411-423 [PMID: 16779459].
  • 3Shah TU, Voils CI, McNeil R, Wu R, Fisher DA. Understandinggastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. AmJ Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1283-1287 [PMID: 22951869 DOI:10.1038/ajg.2012.59].
  • 4Gellad ZF, Thompson CP, Taheri J. Endoscopy unit efficiency:quality redefined. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1046-1049.e1 [PMID: 23978500 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.005].
  • 5Ho WM, Yen CM, Lan CH, Lin CY, Yong SB, Hwang KL, ChouMC. Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil andfentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal andcolonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Gastroenterol2012; 12: 164 [PMID: 23170921 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-164].
  • 6Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, Benson AA, Miller KM,Durkalski V, Aisenberg J. Endoscopic sedation in the United States:results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:967-974 [PMID: 16573781].
  • 7Singh H, Poluha W, Cheung M, Choptain N, Baron KI, TabackSP. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev 2008; (4): CD006268 [PMID: 18843709 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006268.pub2].
  • 8Sint Nicolaas J, de Jonge V, Korfage IJ, Ter Borg F, Brouwer JT,Cahen DL, Lesterhuis W, Ouwendijk RJ, Kuipers EJ, van LeerdamME. Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy usingthe Global Rating Scale. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 462-472 [PMID:22389231 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291663].
  • 9Heuss LT, Peter S. Propofol use by gastroenterologists-theEuropean experience. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008; 18:727-738, ix [PMID: 18922411 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2008.06.007].
  • 10Vargo JJ, Bramley T, Meyer K, Nightengale B. Practice efficiencyand economics: the case for rapid recovery sedation agents forcolonoscopy in a screening population. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007;41: 591-598 [PMID: 17577116].

共引文献6

同被引文献390

引证文献42

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部