期刊文献+

中国阐释学建构的若干难题 被引量:27

The Major Problems in the Construction of Chinese Hermeneutics
原文传递
导出
摘要 建构具有中国风格、中国气派的新的当代中国阐释学面临六大难题:一、基础建构的出发点和落脚点;二、重在方法论还是本体论;三、与语言文字学研究之关系;四、多学科交叉与相融;五、理论的实践与应用;六、形态的系统和完备性。其中的核心和要害是,中国学术传统中虽无阐释学的概念和学科,但有丰富的阐释学思想和经验,这是构建当代中国阐释学的可靠资源和坚实基础。我们要学习借鉴西方,但不是用西方阐释学的已有框架来裁剪或规制中国阐释学经验和思想;应立足于当代中国的政治、经济、文化实践,提取和改造中国传统阐释学资源,从本体论到方法论,提出和建构我们自己的概念、范畴、命题,以至完备的体系。 The construction of a new contemporary Chinese hermeneutics with Chinese style and Chinese manner faces six major problems:The starting point and foothold of basic construction;Focus on methodology or ontology;The relationship with the study of linguistics;Interdisciplinary and integration;Practice and application of theory;The system and completeness of form.The core and key is that although there is no concept and discipline of hermeneutics in Chinese academic tradition,it has rich hermeneutic thoughts and experience,which are the reliable resource and solid foundation for constructing contemporary Chinese hermeneutics.We should learn from the west,but not use the existing framework of western hermeneutics to cut or regulate the experience and thought of Chinese hermeneutics.It should be based on the political,economic and cultural practice of contemporary China,extract and transform the resources of Chinese traditional hermeneutics,put forward and construct our own concepts,categories,propositions,thus complete systems from ontology to methodology.
作者 张江 Zhang Jiang
出处 《探索与争鸣》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期36-42,177,共8页 Exploration and Free Views
关键词 当代中国阐释学 文化传统 方法论 本体论 contemporary Chinese hermeneutics cultural tradition methodology ontology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1汤一介.辩名析理:郭象注《庄子》的方法[J].中国社会科学,1998(1):45-51. 被引量:20
  • 2马希文.人工智能中的逻辑问题[J].哲学研究,1985(1):33-39. 被引量:2
  • 3严修.批判高本汉和胡适对吾我、尔汝的错误论点[J].人文杂志,1959(2):37-43. 被引量:3
  • 4Beishui Liao,Li Jin,Robert C. Koons.Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method[J].Artificial Intelligence.2011(11)
  • 5Pietro Baroni,Massimiliano Giacomin.On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics[J].Artificial Intelligence.2007(10)
  • 6John L. Pollock.Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification[J].Artificial Intelligence.2001(1)
  • 7Philippe Besnard,Anthony Hunter.A logic-based theory of deductive arguments ☆ ☆ This is an extended version of a paper entitled “Towards a logic-based theory of argumentation” published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’2000), Austin, TX, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.[J].Artificial Intelligence.2001(1)
  • 8Phan Minh Dung.On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n -person games[J].Artificial Intelligence.1995(2)
  • 9Reiter R.A logic for default reasoning[].Artificial Intelligence.1980
  • 10Moore RC.Semantical considerations on non-monotonic logic[].Artificial Intelligence.1985

共引文献98

同被引文献187

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部