2Lilic V, Lilic G, Filipovic S, et al. Modern treatment of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Buon, 2009, 14(4): 587-592.
3Querleu D, Leblanc E, Castelain B. Pelvic lymphadenectomy under celioscopic guidance, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 1990, 19(5): 576-578.
4Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic ReViews of Inter Ventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochranehand- book.org.
5Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for nonrandomized studies(minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg, 2003, 73(9): 712-716.
6Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses. Ottawa, Canada: Dept of Epidem iology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/ programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.htm.
7Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
8Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy-a randomized phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements. BJOG, 2010, 117(6): 746-751.
9Panici PB, Plotti F, Zullo MA, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: laparotomy extraperitoneal, transperitoneal or laparoscopic approach? A randomized study. Gynecol Oncol, 2006, 103(3): 859-864.
10Campos LS, Limberger LF, Stein AT, et al. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 2013, 14: 293.
