期刊文献+

心理护理联合健康教育对焦虑症患者心理康复的应用效果分析 被引量:4

Analysis of the Effect of Psychological Nursing Combined with Health Education on Psychological Rehabilitation of Anxiety Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索心理护理联合健康教育对焦虑症患者心理康复的影响。方法:选取于2020年6月至2021年6月入住南宁市第五人民医院心理科森田病区的80例焦虑症患者作为研究对象,采用随机分组、平行对照为原则,分为对照组和观察组。对照组患者实施常规心理护理,观察组患者采取放松训练、改良森田疗法实施等心理护理干预及健康教育。两组的疗程均为6周。在干预前和干预后采用汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表及SF-36健康调查问卷以评定疗效。结果:干预6周后,观察组干预前后组内HAM-A-total score评分明显下降(t=11.04;P=0.0009<0.05),且明显优于对照组[t=179.300;P<0.0001]。观察组干预前后SF-36量表各维度评分除生理机能[t=0.5796;P=0.5639>0.05]外,其余的躯体疼痛、一般健康状况等7个维度均显现出显著的改善作用(P<0.05)。结论:焦虑症患者采用心理护理结合健康教育干预,能比较快速缓解患者的焦虑症状,提高其生活质量,促进患者恢复。 Objective: To explore the effect of psychological nursing combined with health education on psychological rehabilitation of patients with anxiety disorder. Methods: 80 patients with anxiety disorder admitted to Morita ward, Department of psychology, Nanning Fifth People’s Hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected as the research object. They were randomly and parallelly divided into control group and observation group. The patients in the control group received routine psychological nursing, and the patients in the observation group received psychological nursing intervention and health education such as relaxation training and improved Morita therapy. The course of treatment of both groups was 6 weeks. Hamilton anxiety rating scale and SF-36 health questionnaire were used to evaluate the curative effect before and after intervention. Results: After 6 weeks of intervention, the HAM-A-total score in the observation group decreased significantly before and after intervention(t=11.04;P=0.0009<0.05), and was significantly better than that in the control group [t=179.300;P<0.0001]. In the observation group, seven dimensions of SF-36 scale, including physical pain and general health status,were significantly improved before and after intervention except physiological function [t=0.5796;P=0.5639>0.05](P<0.05). Conclusion:Psychological nursing combined with health education intervention can quickly alleviate the anxiety symptoms of patients, improve their quality of life and promote the recovery of patients.
出处 《大众科技》 2022年第1期93-96,共4页 Popular Science & Technology
关键词 焦虑症 心理护理 健康教育 康复效果 anxiety disorder psychological nursing health education rehabilitation effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1王昕,肖春玲,尹福波,王秋燕,杨钟莉,孙航克,张莉,候洪春,陈彦方.围绝经期伴发焦虑/抑郁的综合性治疗疗效观察[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(6):371-375. 被引量:6
  • 2谭诗生,李杭,罗健,陈南江,宋毅,姜桂林,杨飞月.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织研制的生活质量核心调查问卷第3版中文版生活质量调查问卷测评[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(4):23-27. 被引量:312
  • 3位照国,王希林,孙旭坤,李涛,康岚,王雪琴.综合医院住院病人躯体形式障碍的临床特点[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(3):183-185. 被引量:37
  • 4American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed( DSM -Ⅳ ). Washington DC : APA, 1994 : 25 - 34
  • 5Mezzich JE, Schmolke MM. Muhiaxial diagnosis and psychotherapy planning: on the relevance of ICD - 10, DSM - Ⅳ and complementa- ry schemas. Psychother Psychosom. 1995, 63 (2) : 71 - 80
  • 6Janca A, Kastrup MC, Hatschnig H, et al. The ICD - 10 muhiaxial system for use in adult psychiatry: structure and applications. J Nerv Ment Dise, 1996,184(3) :191 - 192
  • 7Saavedra JE, Mezzich JE, Salloum IM, et al. Predictive validity of the physical disorders axis of the DSM multiaxiall diagnostic system. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001,189(7) :435 -441
  • 8Perry JC, Hoglend P, Shear K, et al. Field trial of a diagnostic axis for defense mechanisms for DSM -Ⅳ. J Pers Disord. 1998,12( 1 ) : 56 - 68
  • 9Blais MA, Holdwick DJ Jr, McLean RY, et al. Exploring the psychometric properties and construct validity of the MCMI - Ⅲ anxiety and avoidant personality scales. J Pers Assess. 2003,81 (3) :237 - 241
  • 10Kastrup M, Mezzich JE. Quality of life: a dimension in multiaxial classification. ,Eur Arch Psy Clin N. 2001, 251( Suppl 2) :II32 - 37

共引文献41

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部