期刊文献+

应对气候变化与生物多样性保护的国际规则协同:演进、挑战与中国选择 被引量:10

International Rule Synergy between Climate Change and Biodiversity:Evolution,Challenges and China’s Options
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应对气候变化和生物多样性保护乃是当前国际社会面临的两大紧迫任务,特别是随着全球对气候变化认识的不断深入,二者的关联性被越来越多地提及。然而,目前在其规则协同方面,它们却凸显出诸多滞后与不足,进而严重影响到应对气候变化和生物多样性保护的行动同步。是故,未来国际社会应在整体系统思维的基础上,充分利用碳中和共识的政治推动力,从法律上确立起相互支持原则,以期实现二者的规则协同。对中国而言,则应在碳达峰、碳中和1+N政策体系下充分考虑生物多样性因素,在肯定基于自然的气候解决办法的同时,亦应积极防范应对气候变化与生物多样性保护之间可能产生的规则冲突。 At present,addressing climate change and biodiversity conservation are two urgent tasks for the international society;especially with the deepening of the global response to climate change,their relationship becomes closer.However,there are some lags and deficiencies in rule synergy between climate change and biodiversity,which seriously affects climate change and biodiversity conservation actions.Therefore,in the future,in order to realize their rule synergies,the international society should think about system integration,make full use of political force of carbon neutrality consensus,build mutual support principle in international law.For China,biodiversity conservation should be considered under the carbon peak and carbon neutral 1+N policy system.Nature-base climate solutions should be affirmed.Rule conflicts between climate change and biodiversity conversation should be actively prevented.
作者 吕江 LÜ Jiang(Shool of International Law,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an Shaanxi 710063,China)
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期50-60,共11页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社科基金项目“欧美能源治理现代化的制度性设计及中国的路径选择研究”(20XGJ008)。
关键词 碳中和 气候变化 生物多样性 carbon neutrality climate change biodiversity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

  • 1陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 2C. R. Sunstein,"Of Montreal and Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols," Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1(2007), pp. 1 - 65.
  • 3A. M. Halvorssen,"Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime; Amending the Kyoto Protocol to Include Annex C and the Annex C Mitigation Fund," Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2(2007), pp. 247-265.
  • 4E. A. Posner & C. R.Sunstem," Chmate Change Justice," Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 96(2007 - 2008), pp. 1565- 1612.
  • 5B. A. Green," Lessons from the Montreal Protocol: Guidance for the Next International Climate Change Agreement," Environmental Law, Vol. 39(2009), pp. 253 - 283.
  • 6A. Mumma ~ D. Hodas, Designing a Global Post-Kyoto Climate Change Protocol that Advances Human Development ," Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (2008), pp. 619 - 643.
  • 7A. Sen, Development as Freedom, Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 8[英]简·汉考克.《环境人权:权力、伦理与法律》,李隼译,重庆:重庆出版社,2007年.
  • 9N. Schrijver, The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law: Inception, Meaning and Status, Leiden:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2008.
  • 10A. M. Halvorssen, G obal Response to Climate Change: From Stockholm to Copenhagen," Denver University LawReview,Vol. 85 ,No. 4(2008) ,pp. 841 - 863.

共引文献62

同被引文献359

引证文献10

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部