大国崛起中的跨国司法对话--中国司法如何促进实施“一带一路”倡议

Transnational Judicial Dialogue in the Rise of China:How Chinese Judiciary Enhances the Belt and Road Initiative

在中国政府提出"一带一路"倡议后,中国法院迅速推动其实施,与"一带一路"沿线国家开展了广泛的跨国司法对话。这些跨国司法对话展示了中国的"司法智慧",加强了中国与"一带一路"沿线国家之间的司法交流与合作,增进了它们对中国司法的了解,增强了它们对中国司法制度的信心,也有助于它们了解中国的国家发展和外交政策。具有中国特色的跨国司法对话实践尤其是中国组织的法官"研修"项目,展示了全球化背景下跨国司法对话的多样性及意义。安妮-玛丽·斯劳特最早把跨国司法对话作为国际法上一个独立的理论问题加以分析,揭示了全球化背景下国家间交往中日益重要的一个面向,但其分析存在着应予批判的意识形态偏见。中国的司法制度具有特色,中国组织和参与的跨国司法对话可以为其他国家提供参考和借鉴,中国在跨国司法对话方面的实践也揭示了斯劳特理论的不足之处。

Transnational judicial dialogue initially treated by Anne-Marie Slaughter as a separate theoretical issue reveals one of a State’s engagements of growing importance with other states in the globalization.Given the longstanding judicial philosophy,Chinese judiciary devotes itself to enhancing the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI),for the purpose of engaging the globalization and rising as a leading world power,shortly after that Initiative was established.Transnational judicial dialogue may help improve the understanding of the delivery justice in China and exhibit Chinese judicial wisdom to other BRI countries,thereby increasing the confidence on Chinese judiciary system and enhancing judicial cooperation between China and other BRI countries.It may also help other BRI countries better understand China’s national development and foreign policies.Chinese transnational judicial dialogue has its own characteristics,which especially refers to face-to-face programs research and study or“yanxiu”provided for foreign judges.This article indicates the diversity and significance of transnational judicial dialogue in the globalization.In particular,it demonstrates that China,which judicial system is different from that of the West,may also become a major player of transnational judicial dialogue and benefit other states at least on some aspects.Chinese transnational judicial dialogue sheds light weakness of Slaughter’s theory.