期刊文献+

微信互动时长对人格判断准确性的影响

Impacts of WeChat Interaction Duration on the Accuracy of Personality Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究微信即时互动情境中聊天时长对人格判断准确性的影响,笔者选取138名互不相识的大学生进行5min、10min和20min的微信聊天,对彼此的大五人格做出判断:(1)在所有互动组中,神经质的他评分数显著低于自评分数,而外倾性的他评分数显著高于自评分数;(2)总体而言,除神经质以外,大五人格其余四种特质的自我—他人一致性(SOA)均达到显著水平;(3)分组中,10min组的尽责性和外倾性,以及20min组的尽责性、宜人性和开放性的SOA都比较显著;(4)随着微信互动时长的增加,SOA呈上升趋势,但变化不显著。可见,更长时间的微信互动能使个体表露更多的个人信息,进行更深层的交流,因此观察者做出的人格判断也更准确,这对开展青少年心理健康教育无疑有重要意义。 This research examined the effects of chat duration on the accuracy of personality judgment in the context of WeChat instant interaction, using 138 college students participating in chats for 5, 10 and 20 minutes to make judgments of big-five personalities. The results showed that:(1) other-assessment’s scores of neuroticism was significantly lower than self-assessment’s in all groups of participants while other-assessment’s scores of extroversion was significantly higher than self-assessment’s;(2) the self-other agreement(SOA) of all the big-five personalities achieved significant levels except for neuroticism;(3) the SOA of conscientiousness and extroversion of the 10-min group and the conscientiousness,agreeableness and openness of the 20-min group appeared significant;and(4) with the increase of WeChat interaction time, SOA showed an upward trend, but an insignificant change. It can be seen that longer WeChat interaction can make individuals reveal more personal information, deeper communication, and that the observers made more accurate personality judgments, which is undoubtedly of great significance to carry out mental health education for adolescents.
作者 陈少华 林志鹏 卢桢 CHEN Shao-hua;LIN Zhi-peng;LU Zhen(School of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2022年第2期125-132,共8页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“小学生和初中生发展指导及其效果的研究”(16JJD880006)。
关键词 微信即时互动 人格判断 准确性 信息数量 自我-他人-一致性 WeChat interaction personality judgement accuracy information quantity self-other agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献133

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the inte- grative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.
  • 3Burisch M. You don't always get what you pay for: Measur- ing depression with short and simple versus long and so- phisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984, 18:81-98.
  • 4John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. The big five inventory- versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.
  • 5Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 2007, 41: 203-212.
  • 6Benet-Martinez V, John OP. Los Cinco Grandes across cul- tures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-muhimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75:729-750.
  • 7Robins RW, Tracy JL, Trzesniewski KH, Potter J, et al.Per- sonality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 2001,35:463-482.
  • 8Tsaousis I, Kerpelis P. The traits personality questionnaire 5 (TPQue5): Psychometric properties of a shortened version of a big five measure. European. Journal of Psychological As- sessment, 2004, 20:180-191.
  • 9Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 10FUNDER D C,KOLAR D C,BLACKMAN M C.Agreementamong judges of personality:Interpersonal relations,similarity,and acquaintanceship[J].Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology,1995,69:656–672.

共引文献349

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部