“感受公平正义”命题的两个面向

Two Aspects of the Proposition of“Feeling Fairness and Justice”

“努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平正义”这一命题的提出,既体现了由“看得见的公平正义”向“感受公平正义”的法治转向,更是法治思维和法治实践奔向更高追求的一次飞跃。主观程序正义论为诠释“感受公平正义”命题提供了理论支撑。从心理面向来说,主观程序正义论揭示了满足程序参与者感受公平正义的三个核心要素:信任感、尊严感以及控制感。从司法面向来说,主观程序正义论通过杜绝领导干部干预司法以提升司法程序的信任感、完善争议焦点整理以及心证公开机制以强化司法程序的尊严感、强化指导性案例运用和逐步实现副卷公开以增强司法过程的控制感,最终实现“感受公平正义”。

The proposition of“striving to make the people feel fairness and justice in every judicial case”reflects not only the shift of the rule of law from visible fairness and justice to feeling fairness and justice,but also a leap forward to a higher pursuit in the rule of law thinking and its practice.The theory of subjective procedural justice provides theoretical support for the interpretation of the proposition of feeling fairness and justice.From the psychological perspective,the theory of subjective procedural justice reveals three core elements that satisfy the procedural participants to feel fairness and justice:sense of trust,dignity and control.From the judicial perspective,the theory of subjective procedural justice enhances the sense of trust in the judicial process by preventing leading cadres from interfering in justice,strengthen the sense of dignity in the judicial procedure by improving the mechanism for sorting the dispute focus and opening discretional evaluation of eveidence,and boosts the sense of control in the judicial process by strengthening the use of guiding cases and gradually realize the vice dossier publicity,so that“feeling fairness and justice”can be realized finally.