期刊文献+

盛唐“兴寄”“兴象”范畴中的诗歌体制实践和诗歌功能观念 被引量:1

The Practice of Poetic System and the Concept of Poetic Function in the Categories of“Inner Sustenance”and“Aesthetic Imagery”in the Heyday of the Tang Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 “兴寄”“兴象”范畴在初盛唐革新齐梁诗风的诗史背景下产生、发展,体现出盛唐诗人对诗歌体制的实践以及对诗歌功能的具体认识。从体制上看,“兴寄”说呼应的是发扬汉魏比兴艺术的唐人古体创作。“兴象”之确立则受到近体诗演进过程的实际推助,与盛唐律诗创作存在紧密联系。从时人对诗歌功能的认识来看,“兴寄”说强调诗歌抒情言志,针对的是南朝后期诗歌逐渐演变为娱乐性的工具的弊端;“兴象”突出的是诗歌审美功能,盛唐人延续了南朝诗歌重视艺术美的传统,并结合晋宋以来的山水审美意识加以改造,以当时士人清新壮大的审美理想革清了六朝余弊中的低级趣味。盛唐“兴寄”“兴象”范畴相互补充,体现出初盛唐以来诗歌发展的时代要求,在唐诗史上有其独特价值。 The categories of“inner sustenance”(兴寄)and“aesthetic imagery”(兴象)came into being and developed under the background of the poetic history in which the poetic style of the Qi(齐)State and the Liang(梁)State in the Southern Dynasties(南朝)was reformed in the heyday of the Tang Dynasty.The two categories embodied the specific understanding of the poets in the heyday of the Tang Dynasty concerning the practice of poetic system and the concept of poetic function.So far as the poetic system is concerned,the concept of“inner sustenance”responded to the Tang poets’classic-style writings by carrying on the art of metaphor and analogy(比兴)inherited from the Han Dynasty and the Wei State(汉魏).The establishment of the concept of“aesthetic imagery”was actually promoted by the evolutionary process of regulated poems,and was closely associated with the writing of regulated poems in the heyday of the Tang Dynasty.Judged from the Tang poets’understanding of poetic function,the concept of“aesthetic imagery”highlighted the function of expressing one’s wills and conveying one’s emotions,in opposition to the malpractice of gradually turning poems into tools for entertaining in the late Southern Dynasties.What the concept of“aesthetic imagery”stressed was the aesthetic function of poems.The Tang poets carried forward the tradition of attaching importance to artistic beauty in poetry from the Southern Dynasties,and reformed the tradition in combination with the aesthetic consciousness of landscape art since the Jin Dynasty(晋)and the Song Period(宋),thus getting rid of the low taste in the leftover defects of the Six Dynasties(六朝)by the fresh and growing aesthetic ideal of the Tang elite.The mutual complementation of the categories of“inner sustenance”and“aesthetic imagery”in the heyday of the Tang Dynasty,reflected the epochal requirements for the development of poetry in the early Tang Dynasty,and had its unique value in the history of Tang poetry.
作者 黄琪 Huang Qi(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出处 《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期75-83,共9页 Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 湖南省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度课题“盛唐‘兴象’诗学观念研究”(项目编号:XJK21CDY001)阶段性研究成果。
关键词 兴寄 兴象 盛唐诗学 诗歌体制 诗歌功能 inner sustenance(兴寄) aesthetic imagery(兴象) poetics in the heyday of the Tang Dynasty poetic system poetic function
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

  • 1王世懋.《艺圃撷余》,《历代诗话》,北京:中华书局.1981年版,第775页.
  • 2施补华.《岘佣说诗》,《清诗话》下册,上海古籍出版社1963年版,第993页.
  • 3方回选评,李庆甲集评校点.《瀛奎律髓汇评》卷三,陈子昂《白帝怀古》评语.上海:上海古籍出版社,1986年,第78页.
  • 4杨慎.《升庵诗话》卷七“高榛选唐诗正声”,丁福保辑.《历代诗话续编》,北京:中华书局,1983年,第784页.
  • 5王士稹著,张宗楠纂集.《带经堂诗话》卷四,引自《五言诗凡例》,北京:人民文学出版社,1982年,第93页.
  • 6翁方纲.《格调论中》,《复初斋文集》卷八,《续修四库全书》第1455册,第421页.
  • 7郝敬.《艺圃伧谈》卷三“唐体”,周维德集校.《全明诗话》第四册,济南:齐鲁书社,2005年.第2905页.
  • 8《论西晋五古的结构特征和表现方式》[J].中华文史论丛,2007,(2).
  • 9方回.《瀛奎律髓汇评》卷一,陈子昂.《渡荆门望楚》评语,第1页.
  • 10《从方外十友看道教对初唐山水诗的影响》,《诗国高潮与盛唐文化》,北京:北京大学出版社,1998年.

共引文献13

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部