美国与台澎地区的战后处置问题

The United States and the Post-war Dispute over Taiwan and Penghu Islands

经《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》,美国申明了对台湾地区、澎湖战后处置的主张,认为被日本占领的失地应归还中国。深入考察后,我们发现了清晰中的混沌:台湾归还中国的主张伴随着若干杂音;"军政府"是否实施于台湾地区、澎湖以及两地模式如何未有定论。二战后期,美国对中国收复失地一事,存在矛盾之处,要求苏联接受《开罗宣言》的交涉伴随着出卖大连港的秘密交易。与其说美国对台湾地区、澎湖战后归还中国的表态出于尊重中国的主权和领土完整,不如说是出于某种战略目的,由此可以解释美国在台湾地区、澎湖战后处置具体问题上的混沌性,亦有助于理解几年后美国对《开罗宣言》的无视。对美国在中国收复台湾地区、澎湖中的作用应给予理性评价。

According to the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Announcement,the U.S.affirmed its position on the post-war dispute about Taiwan and Penghu that the lost land occupied by Japan should be returned to China.A closer look reveals some chaos in seeming clarity,that is,the proposition that Taiwan should be returned to China was accompanied by some noises and whether the“military government”should be implemented in Taiwan and Penghu and what modes should these two places adopt did not come to a final conclusion.In late Second World War,the United States were inconsistent toward China’s resumption of the lost territory,and negotiations of asking the Soviet Union to accept the Cairo Declaration were accompanied by a secret deal of Dalian port.Instead of saying that the U.S.statement on Taiwan’s recovery to China after the war was a matter of respecting China’s territorial and sovereign unity,it is more accurate to say there were strategic intents,which could explain the chaos of the specific opinions of the United States toward post-war dispute over Taiwan and Penghu.It also helps to understand the U.S.’complete disregard for the Cairo Declaration a few years later.The function of the United States in China’s recovering Taiwan and Penghu should be evaluated rationally.