期刊文献+

证据生态系统中证据合成与转化研究方法进展与挑战 被引量:3

Progress and Challenges of the Research Methods on the Synthesis and Translational Evidence in Evidence Ecosystem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了证据生态系统中主要证据合成与转化研究方法,并在此基础上提出目前面临的挑战,以期吸引更多研究者关注该领域的进展,进而促进研究方法不断发展和应用。 This paper mainly introduces the major research method on the synthesis and translational evidence in evidence ecosystem.On which based,we proposed the current challenges in this field in order to attract more researchers′attention to this field progress,and promote methodological development and apply of the research method the synthesis and translational evidence.
作者 田金徽 TIAN Jin-hui(Evidence-based Medicine Center School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China)
出处 《中国药物评价》 2022年第1期1-10,共10页 Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation
基金 甘肃省科技计划项目(项目编号:20CX4ZA027:项目名称:中国循证社会科学发展对策研究)。
关键词 证据生态系统 证据合成 证据转化 进展与挑战 Evidence ecosystem Evidence synthesis Evidence translation Progress and challenges
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献106

  • 1Pandora Pound,Ian Roberts,黄进,杜亮.对动物实验进行系统评价的必要性(英文)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(1):3-5. 被引量:3
  • 2熊玮,魏强,刘雪梅.动物实验研究的系统评价简介[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(2):161-163. 被引量:11
  • 3卫茂玲.Cochrane系统评价在中国的现状与问题[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(2):150-151. 被引量:13
  • 4Booth A. Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech, 2006, 24(3): 355-368.
  • 5Wildridge V, Bell L. How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/ management information. Health Info Libr J, 2002, 19(2): 113-115.
  • 6McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving qualitative studies in PsycINFO. Eval Health Prof, 2006, 29(4): 440-454.
  • 7Wong SS, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. Medinfo, 2004, 11(1): 311-316.
  • 8Walters LA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE. Qual Health Res, 2006, 16(1): 162-168.
  • 9Wilczynski NL, Marks S, Haynes RB. Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Qual Health Res, 2007, 17(5): 705-710.
  • 10Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 2009, 6 (6): e1000097.

共引文献197

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部