物之交付执行中的案外人救济程序研究

Study on the Outsider Relief Procedure in the Execution of a Judgment for the Delivery of a Specific Object

在物之交付执行中,执行机构应当仅针对执行名义特定化之物采取执行措施,当事人或利害关系人认为执行标的物不是执行名义特定化之物的,可以通过《民事诉讼法》第232条规定的执行行为异议及复议制度谋求救济。在执行程序开始前或终结后,被漏列为必要共同诉讼当事人的案外人应当通过申请再审之诉救济,其他类型的案外人应当通过第三人撤销之诉的方式谋求救济。在执行程序中,案外人以其对执行标的物享有民事权益为由提出排除执行异议但被执行法院裁定驳回的,案外人阻止物之交付的具体救济途径取决于其是否主张属于被原审法院漏列的必要共同诉讼人,以及据以请求阻止交付的民事权益形成时间与物之交付判决确定时间的先后顺序。

In the execution of a judgment for the delivery of a specific object, the executing agency should only take enforcement measures against the thing specified in the title of obligation. If the parties or interested persons believe that the subject matter of enforcement is not the thing specified in the title of obligation, they may seek relief through the system of dissidence and reconsideration of the execution measure provided in article 225 of the Civil Procedure Law. Before or after the commencement or conclusion of the enforcement proceedings, an outsider who is omitted as a necessary co-litigant shall seek relief by applying for a retrial, and other types of outsiders shall seek relief through a third party’s revocation of the lawsuit. In the process of execution, if a third party raises an objection against execution on the ground that he has civil rights and interests in the subject matter of civil execution, but is rejected by the execution court, the specific relief way for the third party to prevent the delivery of the object depends on whether he claims that he is a necessary co-litigant omitted by the original judgment, and sequence of the formation time of civil rights and interests and the determination time of the delivery judgment.