期刊文献+

生物电阻抗法与双能X线吸收法测量儿童青少年骨矿物含量的比较 被引量:1

Comparative analysis of bone mineral content measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorption among children and adolescents
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价生物电阻抗法(BIA)与双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量儿童青少年的骨矿物含量(BMC)的一致性,为BIA准确测量儿童青少年BMC提供依据。方法采用方便抽样法,于2019年4—5月在广州市某区招募1469名7~17岁儿童青少年,采用DXA和BIA技术分别测量BMC。采用组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman分析评价一致性。Bland-Altman分析在对数转换的数据中进行。将BMC按性别年龄别三分位数分类,计算Kappa值评价一致性。以DXA测量值为因变量,建立BIA校正预测模型。结果男、女生的ICC分别为0.93和0.94。在Bland-Altman分析中,男、女生的BIA与DXA比值的一致性限范围均较宽,分别为0.27~0.76和0.17~0.72。男、女生中两方法判断BMC三分类水平的Kappa值分别为0.57和0.45,呈中高度一致。按BMI分组,各体重状态男生及超重女生的Kappa值均在0.75以上,一致性程度极好。构建的男、女生BIA校正预测模型分别为:BMC_(DXA)=-0.51+0.44×BMC_(BIA)+0.06×Age+0.02×BMI;BMC_(DXA)=-0.55+0.43×BMC_(BIA)+0.06×Age+0.02×BMI。模型的R^(2)值分别为0.87和0.87。结论BIA与DXA所测BMC值一致性较差,但在判断分类BMC水平方面一致性尚可,研究建立的BIA测量BMC校正模型拟合效果好,提示BIA可能适用于评估儿童群体的BMC发育水平。 Objective To compare bioelectrical impedance analysis(BIA)and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA)for measuring body mineral content(BMC)of children and adolescents,and to provide a basis for BIA to accurately measure BMC in children and adolescents.Methods By using the convenience sampling method,among 1469 children and adolescents aged 7-17 were recruited in Guangzhou from April to May 2019,the BMC was measured by DXA and BIA.The intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate the agreement between BIA and DXA.Bland-Altman analysis was performed on log-transformed data.The BMC was categorized into age-and specific-tertiles,and the agreement between methods was evaluated based on the kappa coefficients.Treating the BMC with DXA as the dependent variable,a prediction model was constructed for correcting the BIA measure.Results The ICCs were 0.93 and 0.94 for boys and girls,respectively.In Bland-Altman analysis,the limits of agreements for the BIA-to-DXA ratio were wide in boys and girls,ranging from 0.27-0.76 and 0.17-0.72,respectively.The kappa coefficients for categorized BMC levels were 0.57 and 0.45 for boys and girls,respectively,showing a fair-to-good degree of agreement.When sub-grouped by BMI,the kappa coefficients for all BMI groups of boys and overweight girls were all>0.75,with an excellent agreement.The prediction models for boys and girls were as follows:BMC_(DXA)=-0.51+0.44×BMC_(BIA)+0.06×Age+0.02×BMI;and BMC_(DXA)=-0.55+0.43×BMC_(BIA)+0.06×Age+0.02×BMI,respectively.The R^(2) for models of boys and girls were 0.87 and 0.87,respectively.Conclusion The agreement between BIA and DXA was poor for measuring BMC,but acceptable when evaluating the categorized BMC levels,suggesting the BIA may be applied in assessment of the BMC levels when compared to the age-and gender-specific population.Additionally,the prediction model for correcting BMC by BIA fis well to the measurement by DXA.
作者 卢可缘 姚婉雯 敖丽萍 陆爽 程红 刘军廷 郑义锦 陈超 米杰 杨翌 刘丽 LU Keyuan;YAO Wanwen;AO Liping;LU Shuang;CHENG Hong;LIU Junting;ZHENG Yijin;CHEN Chao;MI Jie;YANG Yi;LIU Li(Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Guangdong Pharmaceutical University,Guangzhou(510310),China;不详)
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第2期280-283,287,共5页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81874271) 2021年广东省科技创新战略专项资金项目(pdjh2021a0258)。
关键词 生长和发育 骨和骨组织 矿物质 儿童 青少年 Growth and development Bone and bones Minerals Child Adolescent
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1黄正南.一致系数的公式及其与相关系数的关系[J].中国卫生统计,1995,12(5):1-4. 被引量:7
  • 2马军,冯宁,阿布都艾尼.吾布力,张世伟,潘勇平,黄永波.双能X线吸收法与生物电阻抗法测量儿童身体成分结果比较[J].中国学校卫生,2007,28(1):3-6. 被引量:12
  • 3陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:217
  • 4Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986, i : 307-310.
  • 5Krouwer JS. Six Sigma can be dangerous to your health. Accred Qual Assur,2009,14:49-52.
  • 6Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error(reliability) in variables relevant in sports medicine. Sports Med, 1998,26(4) :217-238.
  • 7Shoukri MM, Colak D, Kaya N, et al. Comparison of two dependent within subject coefficients of variation to evaluate the reproducibility of measurement devices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008,8 : 24.
  • 8Cuthbert SC, Goodheart GJ. On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing : a literature review. Chiropractic & Osteopathy ,2007,15 : 4.
  • 9Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine : the analysis of meth- od comparison studies. The Statistician, 1983,32:307-317.
  • 10Montaigne. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. British Journal of Anesthesia,2007,309-311.

共引文献47

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部