从碎片化到整体性:基层政务服务数据的治理被引量：24

From Fragmentation to Wholeness:Governance of Grassroots Government Service Data

导出

摘要大数据对社会生产生活的各个方面产生了巨大的影响,政府、企业、民众都在大数据浪潮中享受其带来的裨益,但是大数据在带来便捷的同时,也带来了挑战。在基层政务服务中数据碎片化现象尤为突出,具体表现为基层政务服务的数据烟囱化、数据丛林化和数据鸿沟化。促进基层政务服务数据从碎片化向整体性转化的数字治理工具主要有三种,即块数据、区块链和主权区块链。治理基层政务服务数据碎片化的具体路径在于:以基层政务服务数据系统化来治理数据烟囱,以基层政务服务数据集成化来治理数据丛林,以基层政务服务数据信息化来治理数据鸿沟,从而实现基层政务服务数据从碎片化到整体性的治理。 Big data has a huge impact on all aspects of social production and life. Governments, enterprises and individuals enjoy the benefits brought by big data in the wave of big data. However, while data brings convenience, it also brings challenges. The phenomenon of data fragmentation in grassroots government services is particularly prominent, which is manifested as the information island, data jungle and data gap of grassroots government services. There are three main digital governance tools to transform grassroots government service data from fragmentation to wholeness, namely block data, block chain technology and sovereign block chain. The specific ways to control the fragmentation of grassroots government service data include systematize grassroots government service data to govern the information island, integrate grassroots government service data to govern the data jungle, and to govern the data gap by informatization of grassroots government service data. Consequently, it can realize the governance of grassroots government service data from fragmentation to wholeness.

作者唐玉青 TANG Yuqing(National Governance and National Audit Institute,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing,Jiangsu,211815)

机构地区南京审计大学国家治理与国家审计研究院

出处《行政论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期87-93,共7页 Administrative Tribune

基金国家社会科学基金一般项目“共建共治共享理念下的社区赋权及其治理效能研究”(20BZZ052) 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“大数据时代公共突发事件中江苏政府间协同治理研究”(2021SJA0365)。

关键词基层政务服务数据治理碎片化整体性 grassroots government services data governance fragmentation wholeness

分类号 D693.62 [政治法律—中外政治制度] F124.3 [经济管理—世界经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1李利文.公共服务供给碎片化研究进展:类型、成因与破解模型[J].国外理论动态,2019(1):97-107. 被引量：22
2Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量：254
3曲纵翔,吴清薇.复合治理框架下整体性治理的精准性拓展[J].内蒙古社会科学,2020,41(1):24-31. 被引量：7
4张楠迪扬.区块链政务服务:技术赋能与行政权力重构[J].中国行政管理,2020,0(1):69-76. 被引量：49

二级参考文献97

1朱光磊,张志红.“职责同构”批判[J].北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2005,42(1):101-112. 被引量：728
2Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量：254
3Halligan, J. (2004). Regeneration in an International Context, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (2) : 10 - 12.
4Halligan, J. (2005a). Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes - Future Agendas. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 84 (1): 1-15.
5Halligan, J. (2005b). Public Sector Retorm. In C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds.) , Howard's Second and Third Governments. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
6Halligan, J. (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modem state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).
7Halligan, J. and J. Adams (2004). Security, capacity and post -market reforms: Public management change in 2003. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 63 ( 1 ) : 85 - 93.
8Hood, C. (2002). The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition, 37 ( 1 ) : 15 - 37.
9Hood, C. (2005). The idea of Joined - Up Government: A Historical Perspective. In V. Bogdanor (ed.) , Joined - Up Government. British Academy Occasional paper 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10Hood, C. and H. Rothstein (2001). Risk regulation under pressure. Problem Solving or Blame Shifting? Administration and Society, vol. 33 ( 1, March) : 21 -53.