期刊文献+

“文化实践”:在实践哲学的谱系内——早期文化研究思潮的“文化实践”理论 被引量:6

“Cultural Practice”in Practical Philosophy:“Cultural Practical”Theory in Early Cultural Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 无论是当代西方马克思主义还是中国特色社会主义,几乎不约而同地都把目光聚于文化,强调文化在批判发达资本主义,建设中国特色社会主义的重要意义这意味着提出了一种新的实践形态和实践领域——文化实践。本文论述了早期文化研究思潮的“文化实践”理论并把它安置在实践哲学的谱系中,认为亚里士多德“伦理-政治”实践哲学已经蕴含了实践与文化关系的某些线索,但是这一线索并未彰显出来,其实践哲学主要存在于政治领域。马克思“劳动-社会”的实践哲学把实践置于社会领域,社会包含了文化,然而出于现实的需要,马克思主要强调了社会的制度和组织方面。为了理解无产阶级在发达资本主义社会的革命动力问题,早期文化研究思潮挖掘和彰显了马克思社会实践的文化内涵,系统论述了文化实践理论,构建了文化实践的新模式。这是在当代全球化时代,适应时代发展的实践形式;它有力地批判了单一的经济决定论,为实践哲学开辟了可能性;它使马克思的“劳动-社会”实践哲学潜在的文化意义彰显出来,使马克思的社会实践理论更加完整;它关注大众文化实践,加强了马克思实践哲学的反精英主义。 Both contemporary Western Marxism and socialism with Chinese characteristics focus on culture;they emphasize the significance of culture in criticizing developed capitalism and strengthen the importance of culture in building socialism with Chinese characteristics. This means that a new form and field of praxis-cultural praxis-is being proposed. This paper discusses “cultural practical”theory in early cultural research and situates it in the context of practical philosophy. It holds that the practical philosophy of the “ethicspolitics”of Aristotle,whose practical philosophy was mainly concerned with politics,contains some unnoticed clues about the relationship between praxis and culture. Meanwhile,Marx’s practical philosophy of “laborsociety”situated praxis in the social context and included culture as a part of society. However,due to the needs of reality,Marx mainly emphasized the system and organization of society. In order to understand the revolutionary power of the proletariat in developed capitalist society,early cultural research has explored and demonstrated the cultural connotations of Marx’s social practice and systematically discussed the theory of cultural practice,constructing a new form of cultural practice. This is a practical form adapted to the contemporary era of globalization;it strongly criticizes absolute economic determinism and opens up the possibility of practical philosophy. Moreover,it manifests the cultural significance of Marx’s “labor-society”practical philosophy and further completes Marx’s theory of social practice. Additionally,it focuses on mass cultural practice and strengthens the anti-elitism of Marx’s practical philosophy.
作者 丁立群 Ding Liqun
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期30-40,125,126,共13页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1约翰·斯道雷.《文化理论与通俗文化导论》,杨竹山等译,南京:南京大学出版社,2001年,第157页.
  • 2Moyra Haslett. Marxist Literary and Cultural Theories. [M]. London: Macmillan Press, 2000,P. 136.
  • 3汤普森.《共有的习惯》,上海:上海人民出版社,2002年版,第80-84页,第4页,第5-6页,第51页,第8页,第9页,第10页,第65页,第60页,第64页,第4页,第7页,第199页,第197页,第283页,第198页,第212-213页,第199页,第215页,第244页,第207页,第256页,第256页.
  • 4Edward Thompson. Eighteenth - Century English Society: Class Struggle without Class. [J]. Social History, 3:2 ( May, 1978).
  • 5《马克思恩格斯全集》(46卷上),北京:人民出版社,1979年版,第44页.
  • 6Richard Hoggart. The Uses of Literacy. [M]. London: Penguin, 1958. P. 343.
  • 7Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. [J]. New Left Review, 23 (January-February 1964).
  • 8E· P· Thompson. Revolution again! Or Shut your Ears and Run. [J]. New Left Review, 6 (November- December 1960).
  • 9Harvey Haye. Fanning the Spark of hope in the Past: the British Marxist Historians. [J]. Rethinking History, 4 : 3 (2000).
  • 10理查德·约翰生 罗钢 刘象愚主编.《究竟什么是文化研究》[A].罗钢、刘象愚主编.《文化研究读本》[C].中国社会科学出版社,2000年版.第380页.

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部