期刊文献+

从合同研究组织角度出发谈药物临床试验伦理审评效率 被引量:5

Efficiency of ethical review of drug clinical trials from contract research organization perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的讨论制约国内药物临床试验伦理审评时效的主要因素,提出我国药物临床试验伦理审评效率的改进建议。方法整理某单位过去3年内承接项目的伦理审评时限,以不同洲际、不同国家、国内不同地区为分类标准,多维度比较分析国内外药物临床试验伦理审评时效差异。结果典型国家平均伦理审评时限:中国(49 d)>英国(23 d)>日本(18 d)>美国(9 d)。结论我国药物临床试验伦理审评效率相较其他国家整体较低,且各地区差异明显,希望从国家政策、企业模式和研究中心流程等方面进行优化改善。 Objective To discuss the main factors restricting the prescription of ethical review of drug clinical trials in China and to put forward suggestions on improving the efficiency.Methods The cycle time of ethical review of the projects undertaken by the internship unit in past 3 years was summarized.The difference in the cycle time of ethical review between China and abroad was compared and analyzed by using different countries and different regions in China as classification standards.Results The average cycle time of ethical review in typical countries is as follows:China 49 days>United Kingdom 23 days>Japan 18 days>United States 9 days.Conclusion The efficiency of ethical review of drug clinical trials in China is lower than that in other countries,and there are also significant regional differences in China.It is hoped to optimize and improve the efficiency from the aspects of national policy,enterprise model and clinical research sites.
作者 柴玲玲 尹雅姝 汤依群 CHAI Lingling;YIN Yashu;TANG Yiqun(China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 211198,China;IQVIA RDS(Shanghai)Co.,Ltd,Shanghai 200020,China)
出处 《西北药学杂志》 CAS 2022年第1期136-140,共5页 Northwest Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 药物临床试验 伦理审评 效率 限制因素 drug clinical trials ethical review efficiency limited factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献85

  • 1丛亚丽.生物医学科研伦理可持续发展之研究[J].中国医学伦理学,2005,18(5):1-5. 被引量:12
  • 2王丽宇,戴万津.医院伦理委员会建设的探索[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(12S):33-34. 被引量:17
  • 3田冬霞,张金钟.中国医学伦理委员会研究进展[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(1):78-81. 被引量:31
  • 4伍蓉.美国西部伦理委员会(WIRB)培训体验[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(4):20-22. 被引量:11
  • 5赵帼英,江滨,史录文.我国药物临床试验伦理委员会运作模式及监管机制探讨[J].中国药事,2007,21(1):25-28. 被引量:25
  • 6Directive 2001/20/EC of the European parliament and the council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use [EB/OL]. (2001 - 05 - 01 ). http://europa. eu/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/1 121/1_ 12120010501 en00340044. pdf.
  • 7Central Office for Research Ethics Committees, Governance atrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees E EB/OL]. (2001 - 07 -05 ). http ://www. dh. gov. uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_ digitalassets/.
  • 8National Research Ethics Services. Standing Operating Procedures for Research Ethics Committees, Version3.4 [ EB/OL ]. (2007 - 09- 02). http://www, nres. npsa. nhs. uk/news-and-publications/publications/standard-operating-procedures/.
  • 9Toshiyoshi T.Current status of clinical trials and good clinical trials and good clinical practice in Japan[J].Drug Informat J,1997;31:1071-1078.
  • 10Shunsuke OYK.Clinical trials and the new good clinical practice guideline in Japan:An economic perspective[J].Pharmacoeconomics,2000;18:125-141.

共引文献131

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部