期刊文献+

论档案问责的解构与机制重构 被引量:4

Deconstruction and Mechanism Reconstruction of Archives Accountability
原文传递
导出
摘要 档案问责的科学化是推进档案工作现代化的题中应有之义,也是有效压实档案工作主体责任的现实保障。档案问责的有效和有序展开,应基于档案问责的主客体、情形及其程序的整体框架,对其内在的运作逻辑作出系统性的明确。党的十八大以来,我国档案问责不断走向成熟,但其在具体运行中依然存在协调性、规范性和常态性不足的现实弊端。当前,应通过形成更加全面和深入的多元协同机制、覆盖关照机制、程序操作机制、信息发布机制和理念引导机制,推动档案问责实现科学重构,为推动新时代我国档案管理事业发展奠定更加坚实的根基。 The scientization of archives accountability is an important part of the modernization of archives management,and it is also a practical guarantee for the effective compaction of the main responsibility of archives work.The effective and orderly development of archives accountability should be based on the overall framework of the subject,object,situation and procedure of archives accountability,and its internal operating logic should be systematically clarified.In recent years,the accountability of archives has continued to mature,but there are still practical disadvantages of insufficient coordination,standardization and normality in its specific operations.At present,multiple coordination mechanisms,coverage and care mechanisms,procedural operation mechanisms,information release mechanisms,and concept guidance mechanisms should be formed to promote the reconstruction of archives accountability,so as to lay a more solid foundation for the development of archives management in the new era.
作者 胡洪彬 Hu Honghin(Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,Hangzhou 310018)
机构地区 浙江财经大学
出处 《档案学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期58-65,共8页 Archives Science Study
基金 国家社科基金项目“人工智能时代意识形态工作新态势与应对机制研究”(20BKS199)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 档案问责 档案管理 档案工作 机制重构 archives accountability archives management archives work mechanism reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献116

共引文献237

同被引文献66

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部