期刊文献+

新工科背景下航天专业课程教学改革创新与实践 被引量:1

Research on Teaching Innovative for Aerospace Basic Courses under the Background of New Engineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 航天专业课程既有一定的理论复杂性,又有明确的工程应用需求。针对航天专业课程学生对复杂理论理解深度不够,且工程实践能力和创新能力不足的问题,结合新工科背景下创新型卓越工程人才培养的要求,提出面向CDIO工程教育模式的全流程教学改革创新实践。充分利用线上精品课程资源、开展多样化课堂互动教学、搭建创新实验训练系统、建设航天专业综合研究平台以及鼓励学生参与创新创业竞赛等手段,实现从理论教学、实践应用到创新发展的全流程教学,为培养具有"新素养"的创新型工程技术人才提供思路。 Aerospace professional courses have both deep theoretical complexity and clear engineering application requirements. The thesis aims at the problems of students’ inadequate under standing of complex theories and insufficient practice and innovation ability. Concerning the requirements for diversified and innovative engineering talents of new engineering education, the full-process teaching innovation of aerospace professional courses is proposed based on CDIO engineering education model. By using the resources of excellent courses online, diversified interactive teaching in class, innovative experimental training, professional research platforms, and some competitions, etc., the full-process teaching innovation can be realized. It is composed of theoretical teaching, practical application and innovative development. Thus new method is provided for diversified and innovative engineering talents education.
作者 周敏 周军 郭建国 Zhou Min;Zhou Jun;Guo Jianguo(Institute of Precision Guidance and Control,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an,710072,China)
出处 《中国现代教育装备》 2022年第5期85-87,98,共4页 China Modern Educational Equipment
关键词 新工科 CDIO工程教育模式 航天专业课程 全流程教学改革 new engineering education CDIO engineering education model aerospace professional courses full-process teaching innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1韩雁,冯兴杰,梁志星,张婧.CDIO工程教育模式下的教学效果分析[J].中国民航大学学报,2012,30(4):38-41. 被引量:39
  • 2汪禄应.应用型本科教育人才培养目标与课程体系建设[J].大学教育科学,2005(2):42-44. 被引量:116
  • 3西蒙斯,李萍(译).关联主义:数字时代的一种学习理论[J].全球教育展望,2005,34(8):9-13. 被引量:160
  • 4王宏,吴文虎.清华实践教学“赛课结合”新思路[J].计算机教育,2006(7):10-12. 被引量:53
  • 5《中华人民共和国教育部2006年教育统计数据》,http:∥www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/45/info33545.htm.
  • 6Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R., Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Springer, New York, 2007, p2,694,51,257.
  • 7Ericsson, K.A. 2006.. An Introduction to Cambridge Handbook of expertise and Expert Performance: Its Development,Organization, and Content. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Performance. edited by Ed. Ericsson, K.A., N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 1, p3-19,3,689.
  • 8Connell, M.W., K. Sheridan, and H. Gardner. 2003. On Abilities and Domains. In The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, edited by R.J. Stemberg and E.L. Grigorenko, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 5, p126 - 155.
  • 9Chi, M.T.H. 2007. Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics, in The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Performance, edited by Ed. Ericsson, K. A., N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 2.
  • 10Mayer, Pt. E. 2003. What Causes Individual Differences in Cognitive Performance? In The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, edited by R.J. Steinberg and E.L. Grigorenko, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 10, p265.

共引文献3966

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部