期刊文献+

社会创业、合法性构建与社会企业成长——基于深圳残友集团的纵向案例研究 被引量:13

Social Entrepreneurship, Legitimacy Construction and the Growth of Social Enterprises:A Longitudinal Case Study Based on Shenzhen Canyou Group
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,社会企业运用商业化的手段解决社会问题的模式日渐兴起。构建合法性是新兴社会企业获取资源的必要途径和成长过程中的关键机制,但现有研究对社会企业如何在新兴市场中获取合法性却缺少深入探讨。通过分析典型社会企业—深圳残友集团的发展历程,研究发现了中国情境下社会企业的合法性构建过程和相应策略,归纳了社会企业随着制度环境变化及时调整合法化策略的动态模型,总结了一个在民间基金会帮助下,以商业企业模式运转、由政府参与共同治理的社会创业案例,揭示了社会企业在新兴市场中独特的成长模式。 Recently, social enterprises have used commercial means to solve social problems creatively. Constructing legitimacy is a necessary way for emerging social enterprises to obtain resources and it is also a key mechanism in their growth process. However, less attention has been paid to the legitimacy strategies that social enterprises adopted in their growth and the impact of different types of legitimacy on the growth process of social enterprises. There is still a lack of in-depth research on the dynamic evolution of social enterprise legitimacy strategies, especially in the context of China’s rapidly developing and changing institutional environment. This study is to explore how social enterprises construct legitimacy in emerging market and enrich related theoretical research.Case study is effective for exploring and discovering rare phenomenon. It is used to summarize concepts and then format theories from new phenomenon. As a new form of business organization, there’s limited research on legitimacy construction of social enterprises in emerging markets. Moreover, the growth of social enterprises usually involves a long-term dynamic process. Using single case study method can help researchers to track their legitimacy construction process and strategies adopted in a comprehensive and detailed manner. It is also beneficial to realize specific context and details of the case. Therefore, the study adopts single longitudinal case method. Following the principle of theoretical sampling, this study uses longitudinal case analysis of Shenzhen Canyou Group to explore how it construct legitimacy during its growth. Established in 1997, Canyou Group is a typical case of social enterprise and is also one of the first batch of certified social enterprises in China. It is of large scale and has a long history and profound influence over the country.Canyou Group focused on employment of the disabled, with typical business and social welfare characteristics. This research strictly follows the basic procedures of single case method to collect data from multiple sources, including field survey data, interview data and archival data to achieve triangular verification, and to ensure the overall validity of the data. The data was coded and analyzed following the basic coding procedure and through continuous data feedback and supplementation to increase the validity of the study.This study divides the development of Canyou Group into three stages, including initial stage, growth stage and mature stage. In the initial stage, Canyou Group mainly gained informal legitimacy. During the growth period, Canyou Group initially acquired regulatory legitimacy. In the mature period, Canyou Group basically gained formal regulatory legitimacy.During the whole process, the institutional environment is also gradually evolving, from the initial complex institutional environment to an increasingly mature environment. In this continuous interaction and symbiosis with institutional environment, Canyou Group gradually constructs its own legitimacy. In different development stages, Canyou Group has shown different legitimacy construction strategies. First of all, the study found that when social enterprises are founded in an immature institutional environment, they face many constraints. Therefore, it is very important for social entrepreneurs to choose the opportunities of social entrepreneurship. Moreover, the guidance of personal spirit of social entrepreneurs plays an important leading role in the overall development of the entrepreneurial team and the social enterprise. Secondly, social enterprises should grow based on their basic business in the development process, with the purpose of providing products and services to enhance social well-being. What they need to rely on is the competitive advantage of the enterprise in the market. Finally, social enterprises must choose a reasonable operating model and governance structure. Social enterprises are similar to general commercial enterprises in that they will use commercial methods to solve problems, but social enterprises also need to pay attention to the realization of social value, which is different with normal business enterprises.To conclude, this study has summarized the development of Canyou Group’s social entrepreneurship work and its legitimacy construction process. In addition, this study also concludes how social entrepreneur identify social entrepreneurship opportunities, choose legalization strategies properly and make corresponding action to promote the growth of social enterprises. This study sums up various legitimacy construction strategies adopted by a typical social enterprise under different institutional conditions, as well as how it make timely adjustment in response to the change of institutional environment. This study summarizes a case of social entrepreneurship that operates as a business enterprise model with the help of a bottom-up private foundation and is co-governed by the government. It reveals the distinctive growth of social enterprises in emerging market.
作者 郑刚 陈箫 胡珊 ZHENG Gang;CHEN Xiao;HU Shan(School of Management,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期124-137,共14页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71232013,U1509221)。
关键词 社会创业 社会企业 合法性构建 新兴市场 social entrepreneurship social enterprise legitimacy construction emerging market
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Dees, J G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship[EB/OL]. Comments and Suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Founders Working Group, http: //www. the-el. org/resources-dees103198. htm, 1998.
  • 2Thompson, J L The world of the social entrepreneur[J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2002, 15 (1): 412- 431.
  • 3Alvord, S H, Brown, L D, and Letts, C W. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2004, 40(3): 260-282.
  • 4Brainard, L A, and Siplon, P D. Toward nonprofit organization reform in the voluntary spirit; Lessons from Internet[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2004, 33(3) : 435- 457.
  • 5Mair, J, and Noboa, E. Social entrepreneurship and social transformation; An exploratory study[R]. University of Navarra-IESE Business School Working Paper Series 955, January 19,2006.
  • 6Prabhu, G N. Sociology and entrepreneurship: Concepts and contributions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1991, 16(2): 47- 70.
  • 7Bagozzi, R P, Baumgartner, H, and Yi, Y. State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action:An application to coupon usage[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1989, 18(Mar. ) : 505-518.
  • 8P Drucker. Innovation and entrepreneurship[M]. New York, Harper Business, 1985.
  • 9Guclu, A J, Dees, G, and Anderson, B. The process of social entrepreneurship; Creating opportunities worthy of serious pursuit [EB/OL]. http://www. caseatduke. org/documents/seprocess. pdf. November 2002.
  • 10Robinson, J A. Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets; How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities [A]. in J Mair, Jeffrey A Robinson, and K Hockerts(Eds. ). Social entrepreneurship[C]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

共引文献37

同被引文献195

引证文献13

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部