摘要
在各种刑法解释方法中,文义解释具有优先性。但对于如何确定文义,理论和实践都有不同的见解。传统以类推解释与扩张解释的定义来确定刑法语言含义范围,或者以语言可能的含义来确定语言的涵摄范围,均存在一定的缺陷。国民预测可能性标准具有合理性,在未来的制度设计中,为保证刑法解释不超越国民的预测可能性,法院对解释结论存在争议时,可采取逐级上报的方式,将该解释交由上级人民法院审查决定。在司法领域,最高人民法院对解释的审查结论具有终局性。
Among various methods of the interpretation in the Criminal Law,literal interpretation enjoys the top priority.However,opinions vary from the level of theory and practice on how to determine the literal interpretation.There are certain defects in the traditional definition of analogy interpretation and expansion interpretation to determine the language scope of Criminal Law,or the possible interpretation of language to determine the scope of language.The standard of national prediction possibility is reasonable to a certain extent.In the future system design,in order to ensure that the interpretation of the Criminal Law does not exceed the prediction possibility of nationals,the interpretation can be reported to the higher People’s Court level by level when the court disputes the interpretation conclusion.In the judicial field,the review conclusion of the interpretation of Supreme People’s Court’s is the final result.
作者
戴小强
DAI Xiaoqiang(College for Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2021年第6期82-89,共8页
Journal of Henan Police College
关键词
文义解释
预测可能性
明确性原则
literal interpretation
prediction possibility
the principle of clarity