期刊文献+

健康调查简表评价颅骨修补术后病人生存质量信效度 被引量:12

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY IN EVALUATING QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER CRANIOPLASTY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价健康调查简表(SF-36量表)在颅骨修补术后病人生存质量研究中可靠性、真实性。方法选择颅骨修补术后神志清楚、言语正常病人270例,对其生存质量进行横断面调查,研究中利用组内相关系数、克龙巴赫和古特曼系数等指标进行量表信度评估,运用验证性因子分析评价量表的结构效度。结果本量表重测信度的组内相关系数为0.85,95%置信区间为0.81~0.88,各维度克龙巴赫系数α和古特曼系数λ6均>0.70;量表的两因子二阶模型结构效度为0,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论SF-36量表可用于评价神志清楚、言语正常病人颅骨修补术后生存质量。 Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey(SF-36)scale in evaluating quality of life after cranioplasty.Methods A cross-sectional survey was performed to assess the quality of life of 270 patients with normal consciousness and linguistic function after cranioplasty.Intraclass correlation coefficient,Cronbach’s coefficient,and Gutmann coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability of the scale,and a confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the structural validity of the scale.Results For the test-retest reliability of the scale,the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85(95%CI=0.81-0.88),and a value of>0.70 was obtained for the Cronbach’s coefficientαand the Gutmann coefficientλ6 of each dimension.The two-factor second-order model of the scale had a structural validity of 0,with statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion SF-36 scale can be used to evaluate the quality of life of patients with normal consciousness and linguistic function after cranioplasty.
作者 秦家骏 尹建章 陈先震 沈照立 QIN Jiajun;YIN Jianzhang;CHEN Xianzhen;SHEN Zhaoli(Department of Neurosurgery,The Tenth People’s Hospital of Shanghai,Shanghai 200072,China)
出处 《青岛大学学报(医学版)》 2022年第1期110-114,共5页 Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences)
基金 上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项(201940126)。
关键词 颅骨修补术 生活质量 健康调查 因子分析 cranioplasty quality of life health surveys factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 2Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 3Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 4Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 5顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 6Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 7Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 8Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 9Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.
  • 10Armor DJ.Theta reliability and factor scaling.In: Costner HL, ed.Sociological Methodology:1973-74.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1974.17-50.

共引文献2222

同被引文献149

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部