期刊文献+

互联网诊疗服务质量评价量表构建研究 被引量:7

Construction of Internet Diagnosis and Treatment Service Quality Evaluation Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建互联网诊疗服务质量评价量表并进行信效度检验。方法以SERVQUAL模型为基础,使用文献回顾、半结构访谈和专家函询法,初步构建互联网诊疗服务质量评价量表。通过预调查保证量表条目语言表述的准确性、通俗性。采用便利抽样法,于2021年1月-2月在北京市某三甲医院按就诊号顺序随机抽取至少互联网诊疗1次的340名门诊患者进行量表调查,并运用SPSS 17.0和AMOS 23.0软件检验量表信效度。结果互联网诊疗服务质量评价量表包括可靠性、便捷性、响应性3个维度共15个条目。探索性因子分析提出3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为49.04%。总量表Cronbach'sα系数为0.899,可靠性维度、便捷性维度和响应性维度的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.787、0.723、0.610。验证性因子分析结果显示,该量表模型拟合度较好,量表因子结构稳定。结论基于SERVQUAL模型构建的互联网诊疗服务质量评价量表具有较好的信效度,可用于评价互联网诊疗服务质量,从而为医疗机构改进互联网诊疗服务质量提供依据。 Objective To construct an Internet diagnosis and treatment service quality evaluation scale and test its reliability and validity.Methods Based on the SERVQUAL model,by using literature review,semi-structured interviews and expert letter consultation method,the Internet diagnosis and treatment service quality evaluation scale was initially constructed.The pre-survey was used to further ensure the accuracy and understandability of the language expression of the scale entries.Convenience sampling was used to randomly select 340 outpatients with at least once Internet diagnosis and treatment from January to February 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Beijing according to the order of treatment numbers,and the SPSS 17.0 and AMOS 23.0 software were used to test reliability and validity.Results The Internet diagnosis and treatment service quality evaluation scale included 3 dimensions of reliability,convenience,and responsiveness,with a total of 15 items.Exploratory factor analysis put forward 3 common factors,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 49.04%.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.899,and the Cronbach'sαcoefficients of the reliability dimension,convenience dimension and responsiveness dimension were 0.787,0.723,and 0.610,respectively.The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the scale model had a good fit and the scale factor structure was stable.Conclusion The Internet diagnosis and treatment service quality evaluation scale based on the SERVQUAL model had good reliability and validity.It can be used to evaluate the quality of Internet diagnosis and treatment services and provided a basis for medical institutions to improve the quality of Internet diagnosis and treatment services.
作者 谷兰凌 田宝朋 GU Lanling;TIAN Baopeng(Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing,100096, China;不详)
机构地区 北京回龙观医院
出处 《中国卫生质量管理》 2022年第2期51-54,70,共5页 Chinese Health Quality Management
基金 北京市社会科学基金项目(17GLC047) 北京市属医院科研培育项目(PG2022036) 北京回龙观医院青年科研基金(LY202110)。
关键词 互联网诊疗 服务质量 SERVQUAL模型 评价量表 信度 效度 Internet Diagnosis and Treatment Service Quality SERVQUAL Model Evaluation Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1吴甜甜,何昊,杨丹丹,胡小惠,罗跃嘉,关青.轻度认知障碍的认知控制干预:系统综述[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2021(2):429-435. 被引量:5
  • 2许若兰.论认知行为疗法的理论研究及应用[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006,14(4):63-66. 被引量:85
  • 3沈燕,王立新,严菊浓,贾仙娥,林晨,黄彦清,郑银莲,程小燕.产妇在分娩过程中需求量表的初步研制[J].现代护理,2006,12(1):62-63. 被引量:5
  • 4徐蔼婷.德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J].中国统计,2006,21(9):57-59. 被引量:222
  • 5Zastowny TR, Stratmann WC, Adams EH. Patient satisfaction and experience with health services and quality of care[J].Qual Manag Health Care, 1995,3(3):50.
  • 6Jenkinson C, Coulter A,Bn]ster S, et el. Patient. experience and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care[J]. Qual Saf Health Care,2002,11(4):335.
  • 7Crispin J, Angela C, Stephen B.The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire:development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries[J].lnternational Journal for quality in Health Care,2002,14(5):353-358.
  • 8HCAHPS Fact Sheet[EBlOL].(2013-8)[2014- 4-15].http://www.hcahps.org/home.aspx.
  • 9Fos L,Magafi F, Vittoz FP,el el. Refinement and validation of a French in-patient experience questionnaire[J].International Journal of Heahh Care Quality Assurance,2004,17(1): 17-25.
  • 10左习习,江晓军.社会支持网络研究的文献综述[J].中国信息界,2010(6):75-77. 被引量:37

共引文献67

同被引文献94

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部