期刊文献+

中西哲学追求“永恒”的不同进路——兼论哲学研究的先验维度

Different Approaches of Pursuing"Eternity"in Chinese and Western Philosophies——Also on the transcendental dimension of philosophical research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中西哲学在各自产生和发展的过程中体现出一种相似性,即研究对象的先验性,也就是对“永恒”的不断追求。西方哲学在追求“永恒”的过程中表现出一种超越性的特点,即在此岸世界之外去构建一个支点来为自身辩护。中国哲学则显示出自身的内在性特点,即在此岸世界自身中寻找一个合理的说明体系。中西哲学两种进路的共同点在于追求目标的绝对先验性,而这种先验性恰恰构成了中西哲学以两种不同思维方式追求“永恒”的起点。 In the process of their emergence and development,Chinese and western philosophies show a similarity,namely,the transcendentality of the research objects,or rather,the continuous pursuit of"eternity".When pursuing"eternity",western philosophy shows a transcendental feature,that is,to build a fulcrum outside the world to defend itself.Chinese philosophy shows its inherent characteristics,that is,to find a reasonable explanation system in the world itself.The common point of the two approaches of Chinese and western philosophies lies in the absolute transcendence of pursuing the goal,which exactly constitutes their starting point in pursuing"eternity"with two different ways of thinking.
作者 宋成 SONG Cheng(School of Sociology and Law,Shanxi Normal University,Taiyuan 030031,China)
出处 《山西高等学校社会科学学报》 2022年第3期50-56,共7页 Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi
基金 2020年度山西省高等学校哲学社会科学基金项目“‘永恒’在中西方哲学中的表现形态研究”(2020W058)。
关键词 永恒 先验 内在 超越 中西哲学 eternity transcendental internal transcend Chinese and western philosophies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献7

  • 1Bostock, David, 1982, "Aristotle on the principles of change in Physics I", in Schofield and Nussbaum( edsl ), Language and Logos, University of Cambridge Press.
  • 2Burnyeat, Myles, 2001, A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Mathesis Publication.
  • 3Gill, Mary Louise, 2005, "Aristotle' s Metaphysics reconsidered", in Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 ( 3 ).
  • 4Kirk, G.S. ; Raven, J. E. and Schofield, 2007, The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Ross, W.D. , 1924, Aristotle's Metaphysics, A Revised Text With Introduction And Commentary, vol. Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Oxford University Press.
  • 6玛丽·路易斯·吉尔(Mary Louise Gill).《亚里士多德<形而上学>再思》(Gill,pp.223-251).
  • 7聂敏里.论巴门尼德的“存在”[J].中国人民大学学报,2002,16(1):45-52. 被引量:7

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部