摘要
《晨报》及其副刊存在评价的明显差异,正张是作为研究系喉舌的政党报,副刊则是五四新文化运动的主要阵地。从考辨研究系的办报津贴、被突出的梁启超与被忽略的蒲伯英等问题入手,进一步探究外界评价与该报“不党”的自我声明之间的张力所在,揭示评价差异的背后是1920年代中国政治演进与文化课题的缠夹在报业实践中的体现。
There are obvious differences in evaluating Morning Post and its Supplement.The master Morning News is political party newspaper as the mouthpiece of the Research Department,and the supplement is the main position of the May 4th New Culture Movement.Starting from the textual research on the newspaper allowance of the Research Dpartment,the prominent Liang Qichao and the neglected Pu Baiyin,this paper further explores the tension between the external evaluation and the newspaper’s“no party”self-declaration,and reveals that behind the evaluation difference is the embodiment of the entanglement of China’s political evolution and cultural issues in the newspaper practice in the 1920s.
作者
张泉泉
ZHANG Quan-quan(School of Journalism and Communication,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,Anhui)
出处
《阜阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
2022年第1期135-140,共6页
Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science
基金
安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“文化通变视野中的‘晨报副刊’研究”(AHSKY2017D44)。
关键词
晨报
晨报副刊
新文化运动
研究系
喉舌
Morning News
Morning News supplement
New Culture Movement
Research Department
mouthpiece