摘要
2012年修改后所颁布的《民事诉讼法》针对电子数据作为一种单独的证据表现形式做了明确的规定,但是其相关的立法和司法解释工作有待进一步落实,电子数据案件作为单独的证据表现形式在我国司法的实践中仍然存在许多的问题。通过分析在电子数据的保全、公证原件确认、证明能力确认中可能存在的问题,对其完善路径进行了思考。科技发展在前,法律发展在后,完善了电子数据作为依托证据的认定准则,有利于更好地处理应对复杂的我国司法执行实践中遇到的问题。
The "Civil Procedure Law" promulgated after the revision in 2012 made clear provisions for electronic data as a separate form of evidence, but its related legislation and judicial interpretation work needs to be further implemented, and electronic data cases are manifested as separate evidence. There are still many problems in the form of judicial practice in our country. Through the analysis of the possible problems in the preservation of electronic data, the confirmation of the original notarization, and the confirmation of the ability to prove, the improvement path was considered. The development of science and technology is ahead,and the development of law is behind. The improvement of electronic data as the identification criterion of relying on evidence is conducive to better dealing with the problems encountered in the complex judicial enforcement practice in our country.
作者
赵丹阳
Zhao Danyang(Law School of Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081)
出处
《对外经贸》
2022年第3期78-82,共5页
FOREIGN ECONOMIC RELATIONS & TRADE
关键词
电子数据
保全公证
原件认定
证明力认定
Electronic Data
Preservation and Notarization
Identification of Original Documents
Identification of Proof Force