期刊文献+

从幕后走向台前:信息科学领域自我民族志研究回顾 被引量:1

From Backburner to the Forefront:Review of the Application of Autoethnography in the Information Science Field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]自我民族志是一种关注研究者自我主体性、自我意识和亲身体验的人类学方法,作为一种新的“唤起式”的写作实践,在信息科学研究中尚未得到广泛关注。[方法/过程]本研究从研究主题、运用方式、优越性及局限性等方面归纳了信息科学研究中运用自我民族志方法的研究。[结果/结论]自我民族志的优越性体现在研究视角、研究手段和研究发现呈现方面,其适用性程度取决于研究对象和研究问题的属性。 [Purpose/Significance]Autoethnography offers an anthropological approach to illuminating researchers'subjectivity,self-consciousness and personal experience.As a kind of"evocative"practice,it has not been paid attention in academic field of information science.[Method/Process]This study analyzes the application of autoethnography in the information science research in terms of research topics,forms,advantages and limitations.[Results/Conclusions]The superiority of self-ethnography is reflected in research perspectives,research methods,and the presentation of research findings,and its applicability depends on the nature of research subject and of the research question.
作者 郑光纯 张钰浩 闫慧 ZHENG Guangchun;ZHANG Yuhao;YAN Hui(School of Information Resource Management,Renming University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处 《农业图书情报学报》 2022年第2期40-47,共8页 Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金项目“数字中国背景下数字贫困消减行动研究”(18BTQ007)。
关键词 民族志 自我民族志 信息科学领域 研究回顾 ethnography autoethnography information science field literature review
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献104

  • 1[美]艾利丝和博克纳:《作为主体的研究者:自我的民族志、个体叙事、自反性》,载[美]邓津和林肯:《定性研究(第3卷):经验资料收集与分析的方法》,风笑天等译,重庆大学出版社2007年版,第777-822页.
  • 2[美]劳伦斯·纽曼:《社会研究方法:定性和定量的取向(第五版)》,郝大海译,中国人民大学出版社2007年版,第114~115页.
  • 3Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membershiproles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 4Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). ReflexiveMethodologies : Interpretation and Research. London, Sage.
  • 5Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn in a blind al-ley? Qualitative Health Research ,7:325 -344.
  • 6Bochner, A. P. (2001). Narrative's virtues. Quali-tative Inquiry, 7(2), 131 - 157.
  • 7Bochner, A. P. & Ellis, C. S. (2006). Communi-cation as Autoethnography. In G. J. Sheperd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.). Communication as Perspectives on Theory. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage, pp. 110- 122.
  • 8Boehner, A. P. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann- Healy,L. (1997). Relationships as stories, in S. Duck (ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and in- terventions (2nd ed. ). New York: John Wiley, pp. 307 - 324.
  • 9Boehner, A. P. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann -Healy,L. (1998). Mucking around looking for truth. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter ( Eds. ). Dialectical approach to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erl- baum, pp. 41- 62.
  • 10Bruce, T. (2000) Never let the bastards see youcry, Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 69-74.

共引文献220

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部