期刊文献+

核磁神经成像术在骶骨骨折合并腰骶神经损伤诊治中的应用价值 被引量:3

The clinical value analysis of MRN on diagnosis and treatment of lumbosacral nerve injury associated with sacral fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨核磁神经成像术在骶骨骨折合并腰骶神经损伤诊治中的应用价值,总结骶骨骨折合并腰骶神经损伤的临床特征。方法根据纳入及排除标准,收集2018年10月至2020年10月天津医院收治骶骨骨折合并腰骶神经损伤40例患者的病历资料。单侧骶骨骨折24例,均为Tile分型C1型,Denis分型Ⅱ型16例、Ⅲ型8例;双侧骶骨骨折16例,均为Tile分型C3型,Denis分型Ⅱ型,均为骶骨"U"形骨折。所有患者均存在腰骶神经损伤表现,采用对比增强三维核磁神经成像术(contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance neurography,CE-3D MRN)检查明确骶神经损伤部位及严重程度。将L_(5)及S_(1)~S_(4)神经依据侧别及椎管内(intraspinal type,IS)、椎间孔内(intraforaminal type,IF)及椎间孔外(extraforaminal type,EF)进行分段定位,并判断神经损伤严重程度(轻度、中度及重度)。将各段神经损伤数量进行整体及两两配对χ^(2)检验。11例患者进行神经探查术,根据术中所见记录神经损伤部位及严重程度,并与CE-3D MRN检查结果进行统计分析。结果CE-3D MRN显示腰骶神经损伤发生侧均存在骶骨骨折,共239段神经发生不同程度及部位的损伤。统计分析显示神经损伤发生由多至少依次为S_(1)、S_(2)、L_(5)、S_(3)、S_(4)神经;除S_(1)、S_(2)间及S_(3)、S_(4)间的差异无统计学意义外,其余各神经损伤发生例数两两比较的差异均有统计学意义。11例手术患者术中直视下见神经损伤部位及严重程度与影像检查结果差异无统计学意义(Fisher检验,P=1.000)。结论核磁神经成像术能够清晰、准确显示骶骨骨折合并腰骶神经损伤的部位及严重程度,可作为此类损伤的首选检查方法,具有重要的临床应用价值;腰骶神经损伤具有S_(1)、S_(2)最为多发,L_(5)次之,S_(3)、S_(4)最少的特征。 Objective To discuss the clinical value of magnetic resonance neurography(MRN)on diagnosis and treatment of lumbosacral nerve injury associated with sacral fractures and analyze the characters of nerve injury which was caused by sacral fractures.Methods The clinical data of 40 patients who had lumbosacral nerve injury associated with sacral fractures and accepted treatment in Tianjin hospital from August 2018 to December 2020 were collected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.Twenty-four patients had unilateral sacral fractures(Tile C1)which included 16 Denis II type fractures and 8 Denis III type fractures.Sixteen patients had bilateral sacral fractures which were all Tile C3,U shaped and Denis II type sacral fractures.All patients had symptoms or signs of lumbosacral nerve injury,and accepted contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance neurography(CE-3D MRN)to diagnose the injury part and severity degree.The L_(5)-S_(4) nerves were separated to three parts based on injured side and intraspinal type(IS),intraforaminal type(IF)and extraforaminal type(EF)location,and were judged the mild,medium or severe degree of nerve injury severity.Overall and pairwise Chi-square test was performed on the number of nerve injuries.Eleven patients accepted the operation of nerve dissection and exploration.The nerve injury part and severity were recorded under direct vision,and were statistically analyzed with CE-3D MRN outcome.Results The outcome of 239 lumbosacral nerve injuries which had different part and severity were found by MRN,and all combined with sacral fractures of the same side.The nerves which ranked from largest to fewest according to injured numbers were L_(5),S_(1),S_(2),S_(3) and S_(4).The statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences of injured nerve numbers except between S_(1) and S_(2),S_(3) and S_(4),and there were no significant difference of nerve injury part and severity degree between the direct visual judgement intraoperatively and preoperative CE-3D MRN examination.Conclusion MRN can reveal the part and severity degree of lumbosacral nerve injury associated with sacral fracture clearly and accurately,which has important clinical value and should become the preferred examination of such injuries.The lumbosacral nerve injury has the most frequent features of S_(1) and S_(2),followed by L_(5),and the least in S_(3) and S_(4).
作者 张晓光 贾健 陈文欢 董潇蔓 田维 郭林 王植 Zhang Xiaoguang;Jia Jian;Chen Wenhuan;Dong Xiaoman;Tian Wei;Guo Lin;Wang Zhi(Department of Radiology,Tianjin Hospital,Tianjin 300211,China;Department of Plevic Trauma,Tianjin Hospital,Tianjin 300211,China;The Third Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405,China)
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期306-312,共7页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 天津市卫生健康委员会科技项目(ZC20018)。
关键词 骶骨 骨折 脊神经 周围神经损伤 磁共振成像 神经成像 Sacrum Fractures,bone Spinal nerves Peripheral nerve injuries Magnetic resonance imaging Neuroimaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献68

  • 1杜明奎,王秋根.骶骨骨折治疗进展[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(4):198-201. 被引量:9
  • 2Shaw BA, Holman M. Traumatic lumbosacral nerve root avulsions in a pediatric patient. Orthopedics, 2003, 26( 1 ) :89 -90.
  • 3Lu X, Hou C, Yuan W, et al. Complete traumatic anterior disloca- tion of the lumbosacral joint : a case report. Spine, 2009, 34 (14) : 488 - 492.
  • 4Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important prob-lem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, (227) :67 -81.
  • 5Chin CH, Chew KC. Lumbosacral nerve root avulsion. Injury, 1997, 28(9) :674 -678.
  • 6Schmidek HH, Smith DA, Kristiansen TK. Sacral fractures. Neurosur- gery, 1984, 15(5):735-746.
  • 7Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T, et al. Sacral fractures: an important problem, though frequently undiagnosed and untreated: retrospective analysis of two hundred and three consecutive cases. Orthop Trans, 1987, 11(2) :118 -127.
  • 8Huittinen VM. Lumbosacral nerve injury in fracture of the pelvis. A postmortem radiographic and patho - anatomical study. Acta Chit Scand, 1972, 429(1) :3 -43.
  • 9Banrngartner MR, Wengner D, Booke J. SSEP monitoring during pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma, 1994, 8(2) :127 - 133.
  • 10Helfet D, Koval K, Hissa EA, et al. Intraoperative somatosensory e- voked potential monitoring during acute pelvic fracture surgery. J Or- thop Trauma, 1995, 9( 1 ) :28 - 34.

共引文献79

同被引文献32

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部