期刊文献+

论国际投资仲裁中推定的适用

On the Application of Presumption in International Investment Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 推定包括事实推定和法律推定,是争端解决中认定事实的重要法律工具。在国际投资仲裁中,仲裁庭适用推定具有相应的法律依据,实践中推定亦得到了频繁的适用。事实推定和法律推定具有不同的适用条件,对举证责任也会产生不同的影响。在涉华投资仲裁中多起案件涉及推定问题,通过反思可以从中获得一些有益的启示。作为国际投资仲裁的参与者,我国政府和海外投资企业应当能够熟练运用推定这一法律工具,同时在商签新的投资协定时,我国政府应当注意明确规定相关条款的内容,以防止在争端解决中仲裁庭作出不符合缔约方预期的推定。 Presumption which includes factual presumption and legal presumption is an important method of fact-finding in dispute resolution.In international investment arbitration,the arbitral tribunal has the theoretical and legal basis for the application of presumption,and the presumption has been frequently applied in practice.In international investment arbitrations,factual presumption and legal presumption have different application conditions,and have different effects on the burden of proof.The issue of presumption has been involved in many China-related investment arbitrations,from which we can get some useful reflections and enlightenments.As participants in international investment arbitration,The Chinese Government and overseas enterprises should master the legal tools and apply them in the practice of investment dispute settlement skillfully.Meanwhile,during negotiating new investment agreements,The Chinese Government should pay attention to stipulating contents of the provisions clearly,so as to prevent the arbitral tribunals from making uncontemplated presumptions in dispute settlement.
作者 崔起凡 CUI Qifan
出处 《武大国际法评论》 2022年第1期101-119,共19页 Wuhan University International Law Review
基金 浙江省社会科学规划项目“‘一带一路’背景下投资者—东道国仲裁中的证据问题研究”(项目批准号:18NDJC090YB)的阶段性成果之一。
关键词 国际投资仲裁 证明责任 证明标准 法律推定 事实推定 international investment arbitration burden of proof standard of proof legal presumption factual presumption
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1裴苍龄.论推定[J].政法论坛,1998,16(4):53-58. 被引量:36
  • 2张卫平.民事诉讼法律审的功能及构造[J].法学研究,2005,27(5):41-50. 被引量:33
  • 3廖荣兴.推定在民事诉讼中的运用[J].湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2005,17(6):75-78. 被引量:3
  • 4劳东燕.认真对待刑事推定[J].法学研究,2007,29(2):21-37. 被引量:168
  • 5D Sandifer, Evidence before International Tribunals, University Press of Virginia, 1975, pp. 141-142.
  • 6Territorial Dispute ( Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad ), ICJ Reports 1994, p. 28, para. 56.
  • 7Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan, Diss Op Judge Franck, pp. 692-704, p. 2.
  • 8Preab Vibear case, ICJ Reports 1962, Sep Op Judge Fitzmaurice, p. 61, Sep Op Judge Alfaro, p. 41, pp. 28-29, Diss O19 Judge Sir Percy Spender, p. 109.
  • 9Chittharanjan F. Amerasinghe, Evidence in International Liti- gation, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 219-220.
  • 10联合国:《国际法院判决、咨询意见和命令摘要》(1948-1991)[M],联合国出版物,1993年版,第59页.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部