多重评估主体视角下中国境外产业园区规划实施评估框架与指标体系研究

Research on the Implementation Evaluation Framework and Index System for the Planning of China’s International Cooperation Parks from Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders

规划实施评估对于中国境外产业园区实现可持续开发建设具有不可或缺的作用。本文在回顾相关理论研究与实践进展的基础上,提出中国境外产业园区规划实施评估总体框架,即考虑境外产业园区发展特点与属性,立足规划实施评估目的与需求,借鉴既有研究、经典理论与实践,并结合具体规划类别与内容,统筹确定规划实施评估内容。研究认为,境外产业园区规划实施评估是自上而下地了解园区发展成效和制定发展政策、自下而上地反馈发展诉求与发展建议的双向互动过程。兼顾各类参与主体对评估的期望,本文提出"规划实施环境评估+规划实施过程评估+规划实施效果评估+规划工作与成果评估+可持续发展目标评估"这一整体性评估方案,并以总体规划为例,尝试构建境外产业园区总体规划实施评估指标体系。此外,针对境外产业园区发展的多元性,本文提出对境外产业园区进行分发展阶段、分产业类型、分规划类型评估指引。本研究对于丰富境外产业园区规划研究体系具有积极意义,对于境外产业园区规划实施评估工作也具有较好的参考价值。

Planning implementation evaluation is necessary for the sustainable development and construction for China’s international cooperation parks(ICPs). Based on the review of related theoretical research and practical progress, this paper proposes a theoretical framework for the planning implementation evaluation of ICPs. The framework involves the development characteristics and attributes of ICPs with the purposes and needs of evaluation, and coordinately clarifies the content of evaluation after drawing on existing research theories and practices, combining specific planning categories and contents. This paper believes that the planning implementation evaluation of ICPs is a two-way interactive process to understand the development effectiveness and formulating development policies from the top down, and feeding back development requests and suggestions from the bottom up. Considering the expectations of multiple stakeholders on the evaluation, this paper proposes the overall evaluation plan of “implementation environment evaluation +implementation process evaluation + implementation effectiveness evaluation + planning work and result evaluation + sustainable development goal evaluation”and the evaluation index system taking the master plan of ICPs as an example. Finally, this paper puts forward guidelines for the evaluation by the development stage, industry type, and planning type considering the diversification of ICPs. This paper is of positive significance for enriching the researches of ICPs planning, and could be good reference for the planning implementation evaluation of ICPs.