期刊文献+

建设项目环境污染第三方监管平台价格结构研究

The Price Structure of the Third-party Supervision Platform for Environmental Pollution of Construction Projects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为明确政策对建设项目环境污染第三方监管平台价格结构的影响,基于Armstrong定价模型,引入政策性因素,构建该平台的价格结构模型。在模型基础上,分析各参数变量实际含义,指出政策因素在平台价格结构制定中的重要性,厘清政策对价格结构的影响路径和效果,并应用案例对所构建模型进行分析。研究发现,政策因素的补贴和惠及力度会提高或减弱平台用户的组内网络外部性和最优注册费,合理设置可实现平台双方的利益和公共服务价值最大化。研究结果为公共服务平台中政府制定惠及责任方、平台、公众的合理政策提供参考。 In order to clarify the impact of policies on the price structure of the third-party supervision platform for environmental pollution of construction projects,the policy factors were introduced to construct the price structure model based on the Armstrong Model.By analyzing the actual meaning of each parameter in the model,the importance of policy factors was determined,and the influence paths and effects of policies on price structure were further clarified.Results show that the subsidies and benefits of policy factors will increase or decrease the internal network externalities of platform users and the optimal registration fees.A reasonable setting can maximize the benefits of both platform parties and public services value.This study provides a reference for the government to formulate reasonable policies of the public service platforms that benefit the responsible parties,the platforms,and the public.
作者 刘琪 汤百川 吴伟巍 LIU Qi;TANG Bai-chuan;WU Wei-wei(School of Civil Engineering,Southeast University,Nanjing 210000,China;Nanjing Jingzhu Wisdom Technology Co.Ltd.,Nanjing 210000,China)
出处 《工程管理学报》 2022年第1期100-105,共6页 Journal of Engineering Management
基金 江苏省社会科学基金项目(21ZD014).
关键词 政策因素 环境污染 第三方监管平台 Armstrong模型 价格结构 policy factors environmental pollution third-party supervision platform Armstrong model price structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1王要武,吴宇迪.智慧建设及其支持体系研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(S2):241-244. 被引量:44
  • 2李郁芳,李项峰.地方政府环境规制的外部性分析——基于公共选择视角[J].财贸经济,2007,28(3):54-59. 被引量:26
  • 3Rochet J, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets [ J ]. Journal of European Economic Association, 2003, 1: 990-1029.
  • 4Sujit Chakravorti, Roberto Roson. Platform competition in two-sided markets: The case of payment networks[ J ]. Review of Network Economics, 2006, 5 ( 1 ) : 118-143.
  • 5Manenti F M, Somma E. Plastic Clashes : Competition among Closed and Open System in the Credit Card Industry [ R ]. Working Paper, Berkeley: Berkeley Haas Business School at the University of California, 2002.
  • 6Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[ J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37: 668-691.
  • 7Ulrich K, Wright J. Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry[ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24 : 1-28.
  • 8Rochet J, Tirole J. Cooperation among competitors : The economics of payment card associations [ J ]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2002, 33(4): 549-570.
  • 9Wright J. Optimal card payment system[J]. European Economic Review, 2003, 47: 587-612.
  • 10Schwartz M, Vincent D. Same price, cash or card: Vertical control by payment networks[ J ]. Review of Network Economics, 2006, 5(1) : 72 - 102.

共引文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部