期刊文献+

常规MRI与MR关节造影诊断肩关节前脱位所致盂肱下韧带及前下盂唇撕裂 被引量:7

Conventional MRI and MR arthrography in diagnosing inferior glenohumeral ligament and anterior inferior labrum tears caused by anterior dislocation of shoulder joint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对比观察常规MRI与MR关节造影(MRA)对肩关节前脱位所致盂肱下韧带及前下盂唇撕裂的诊断价值。方法 对56例肩关节前脱位患者(56侧患肩)行肩关节常规MR检查及MRA,以手术结果为金标准,对比观察其对盂肱下韧带撕裂及前下盂唇撕裂的诊断价值。结果 56侧患肩中,38侧(38/56, 67.86%)盂肱下韧带撕裂,44侧(44/56, 78.57%)前下盂唇撕裂。常规MRI诊断盂肱下韧带撕裂的敏感度为26.32%(10/38)、特异度为83.33%(15/18)、准确率为44.64%(25/56),诊断前下盂唇撕裂分别为88.64%(39/44)、 75.00%(9/12)及85.71%(48/56);MRA诊断盂肱下韧带撕裂的敏感度为89.47%(34/38),特异度为100%(18/18),准确率为92.86%(52/56);诊断前下盂唇撕裂分别为93.18%(41/44)、83.33%(10/12)及91.07%(51/56)。MRA诊断盂肱下韧带撕裂的敏感度及准确率高于常规MRI(χ^(2)=27.69、25.47,P均<0.05),特异度与常规MRI差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.15,P>0.05);诊断前下盂唇撕裂的敏感度、特异度及准确率与常规MRI差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.56、2.73、4.42,P均>0.05)。结论 MRA对盂肱下韧带撕裂的诊断效能优于常规MRI;对前下盂唇撕裂的诊断效能与常规MRI相当。 Objective To compare the values of conventional MRI and MR arthrography(MRA)for diagnosing inferior glenohumeral ligament and anterior inferior labrum tears caused by anterior dislocation of shoulder joint.Methods Conventional MR examinations and MRA were performed in 56 patients with anterior dislocation of unilateral shoulder.Taken surgical results as the gold standards,the diagnostic values of conventional MRI and MRA for inferior glenohumeral ligament tear and anterior inferior labrum tear were observed and compared.Results Inferior glenohumeral ligament tear and anterior inferior labial ligament tear were detected in 38(38/56,67.86%)and 44(44/56,78.57%)shoulders,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of conventional MRI in diagnosis of inferior glenohumeral ligament tear was 26.32%(10/38),83.33%(15/18)and 44.64%(25/56),in diagnosis of anterior inferior labial ligament tear was 88.64%(39/44),75.00%(9/12)and 85.71%(48/56),respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MRA in diagnosis of anterior inferior labial ligament tear was 89.47%(34/38),100%(18/18),and 92.86%(52/56),of anterior inferior labial ligament tear was 93.18%(41/44),83.33%(10/12)and 91.07%(51/56),respectively.The sensitivity and accuracy of MRA for diagnosing inferior glenohumeral ligament tears were all higher than those of conventional MRI(χ^(2)=27.69,32.47,both P<0.05),but there was no significant difference of the specificity between MRA and conventional MRI(χ^(2)=4.15,P>0.05).There was no significant difference of the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MRA and conventional MRI for diagnosing anterior inferior labrum tears(χ^(2)=4.56,2.73,4.42,all P>0.05).Conclusion For inferior glenohumeral ligament tear,MRA had better diagnostic efficacy than conventional MRI,while for anterior inferior labrum tear,the diagnostic efficacy of MRA was comparable to that of conventional MRI.
作者 吴俊华 但倩 张滔 李旭雪 WU Junhua;DAN Qian;ZHANG Tao;LI Xuxue(Department of Radiology,Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第3期435-439,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 肩关节脱位 磁共振成像 shoulder dislocation magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献33

  • 1[1]Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL. Anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic criteria determined from prospective analysis of 121 MR arthrography[J]. Radiology, 1995, 197(3): 819-825.
  • 2[2]Workman TL, Burkhard TK, Resnick D, et al. Hill-sachs lesion: comparison of dectection with MR imaging, radiography, and arthroscopy[J]. Radiology, 1992, 185(3): 847-852.
  • 3[3]Willemsen UF, Wiedemann E, Brunner U, et al. prospective evaluation of MR arthrography performed with high-volume intraarticular saline enhancement in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder[J]. AJR, 1998, 170(1): 79-84.
  • 4[4]Gusmer PB, Potter HG, Schatz JA, et al. Labral injuries: accuracy of detection with unenhanced MR imaging of the shoulder[J]. Radiology, 1996, 200(2): 519-524.
  • 5[5]Schweitzer ME. MR arthrography of the labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder[J]. Radiology, 1994, 190(3): 641-643.
  • 6[6]Tirman PFJ, Bost FW, Garvin GJ, et al. Posterosuperior glenoid impingement of the shoulder: findings at MR imaging and MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation[J]. Radiology, 1994, 193(2): 431-436.
  • 7[7]Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, Deberardino T, et al. Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography[J]. AJR, 1993, 161(12): 1229-1235.
  • 8[8]Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI, et al. Labrai- ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography[J]. Radiology, 1994, 190(3): 645-651.
  • 9Mitchell MJ, Causey G, Bethoty DP, et al. Peribursa fat plane of the shoulder: anatomical study and clinical experience [ J ]. Radiology,1988,168(1): 99 - 102.
  • 10Coumas JM, Waite RJ, Goss TP, et al. CT and MRI evaluation of the labral capsular ligamentous complex of the shoulder[ J]. A JR, 1992,158(3): 591 -597.

共引文献24

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部