期刊文献+

弥散加权成像的不同定量参数值在直肠癌术前评估中的应用价值 被引量:4

The application value of different quantitative parameters of diffusion weighted imaging in preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同表观扩散系数(ADC)值在直肠癌术前评估中的价值。方法109例直肠癌患者,术前均行常规MRI及扩散加权成像(DWI)序列扫描。比较不同分组的ADC最大值、最小值、平均值和差值。绘制各参数受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,通过比较ROC曲线下面积(AUC)明确诊断效能。结果不同ADC参数值组间一致性为0.845~0.907。未突破组的ADC平均值高于突破组(AUC=0.727,P=0.003)。无淋巴结转移的ADC最大值、最小值和平均值均高于有淋巴结转移组(AUC=0.651、0.678、0.787,P<0.001)。无脉管或神经束膜侵犯的ADC最大值、最小值和平均值均高于有脉管或神经束膜侵犯(AUC=0.719、0.665、0.744,P<0.05)。结论ADC定量参数值可用于术前评估直肠癌的分期、淋巴结转移和脉管或神经束膜侵犯且ADC平均值诊断效能较高。 Objective To investigate the application value of different quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)measured by diffusion weighted imaging(DWI)in preoperative rectal cancer.Methods One hundred and nine patients with rectal cancer were collected retrospectively.All patients received preoperative magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and DWI scanning.The maximum,minimum,average,and different values of ADC were compared among different groups.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve of each parameter of ADC was analyzed,and the area under the ROC curve(AUC)was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each parameter for preoperative rectal cancer.Results The agreement between different ADC parameter values was 0.845~0.907.The average ADC value in the non-breakthrough group was significantly higher than that of the breakthrough group(AUC=0.727,P=0.003).The maximum,minimum and average values of DAC without lymph node metastasis were significantly higher than those with lymph node metastasis(AUC=0.651,0.678 and 0.787,P<0.001).The maximum,minimum and average values of DAC without vascular or perineurial invasion were significantly higher than those with vascular or perineurial invasion(AUC=0.719,0.665 and 0.744,P<0.05).Conclusion Different quantitative parameters of ADC can be used to evaluate different stages,lymph node metastasis and vascular or perineurial invasion in preoperative rectal cancer.The diagnostic efficiency of average ADC value is higher.
作者 袁艺 李杭 方著 张凤 蒲红 YUAN Yi;LI Hang;FANG Zhu;ZHANG Feng;PU Hong(North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China;Department of Radiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China)
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2022年第2期19-23,共5页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 四川省科技厅重点研发项目(编号:2019YFS0437)。
关键词 弥散加权成像 表观扩散系数 直肠癌 淋巴结转移 分化程度 Diffusion weighted imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient Rectal cancer Lymph node metastasis Degrees of differentiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献87

  • 1蒋晓东,戴鹏,吴瑾,宋大安,于金明.放疗联合周剂量重组人血管内皮抑素对A549肺腺癌裸鼠移植瘤生长抑制作用的研究[J].肿瘤,2010,30(11):917-923. 被引量:7
  • 2FLEMING FJ, MONSON JR. Accurate staging, selectivepreoperative therapy and optimal surgery can deliver agood oncological and functional outcome in low rectalcancer[J]. Dig Surg, 2010,27(3): 182—184.
  • 3GERARD JP, AZHIA D, GOURGOU-BOURGADE S,et al. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyregimens for locally advanced rectal cancer : results ofthe phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2 [J]. JClin Oncol, 2010,28(10): 1638-1644.
  • 4HONG SP, MIN BS, KIM TI,et al. The differentialimpact of microsatellite instability as a marker ofprognosis and tumour response between colon cancer andrectal cancer [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48 (8) : 1235-1243.
  • 5DULDULAO MP, LEE WT STREJA L, et al.Distribution of residual cancer cells in the bowel wallafter neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectalcancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013,56(2) : 142-149.
  • 6HUH JW, KWON SY, LEE JH, et al. Comparison ofrestaging accuracy of repeat FDG -PET/CT with pelvicMRI after preoperative chemoradiation in patients withrectal cancer [J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2015 , 141(2): 353-359.
  • 7NIKBERG M, KINDLER C, CHABOK A, et al.Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic markerin the modem multidisciplinary management of rectalcancer [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015 , 58(3): 275-282.
  • 8BURTON S,BROWN G,DANIELS I,et al. MRIidentified prognostic features of tumors in distal sigmoid,rectosigmoid, and upper rectum : treatment withradiotherapy and chemotherapy [J]. Int J Radi at OncolBiol Phys,2006,65(2): 445-451.
  • 9BARBARO B, VITALE R, LECCISOTTI L, et al.Restaging locally advanced rectal cancer with MRimaging after chemoradiation therapy [ J ].Radiographics, 2010, 30(3) : 699-716.
  • 10AKASHI M, NAKAHUSA Y, YAKABE T, et al.Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3 -TMRI : correlation between the apparent diffusioncoefficient as a potential imaging biomarker andhistologic prognostic factors [J]. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(5): 524-531.

共引文献83

同被引文献54

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部