大数据时代大学思政智慧课堂的交往实践与批判——基于哈贝马斯的交往理论分析

Communication Practice and Criticism of University Ideological and Political Smart Classroom in Big Data Era

智慧课堂介入到大学思政教学实践中,弥补了传统教学中难以克服的诸多课堂管理缺陷,同时也以“技术殖民”的烈度,侵蚀着思政教学的人文底色。哈贝马斯有关技术异化的思考及对交往理性范畴的界定,拓展了对智慧课堂的考察角度,明确了智慧课堂实现虚拟交往的合法性,并从交往理性的视角把智慧课堂视为基于彼此理解的、民主化的交往方式。把技术融入主体,以“主体间性”实现师生互动,既是哈贝马斯基于技术现状对人的同情关怀,也是智慧课堂语境下反思技术异化的一种思路。

The introduction of smart classroom in the practice of ideological and political teaching in universities makes up for many classroom management defects that are difficult to overcome in traditional teaching.At the same time,it erodes the humanistic background of ideological and political teaching with the intensity of“technological colonization”.Habermas's thinking on technology alienation and the definition of communicative rationality expands the perspective of smart classroom,clarifies the legitimacy of virtual communication in smart classroom,and regards smart classroom as a democratic communication way based on mutual understanding from the perspective of communicative rationality.Integrating technology into the subject to realize the interaction between teachers and students with"intersubjectivity"is not only Habermas's sympathy and concern for people based on the status quo of technology,but also a way of thinking about technological alienation in the context of smart classroom.