期刊文献+

刑事诉讼中人脸识别证据的理论界定与规则构建 被引量:4

Theoretical Definition and Rule Construction of Face Recognition Evidence in Criminal Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人脸识别证据在刑事司法实践中已实际应用,但规范缺失。基于人脸识别证据的形成机理及其科技性、盖然性、复验性和信息关联性特点,可在现阶段将人脸识别证据定位于鉴定意见类证据。但刑事诉讼中人脸识别证据与典型鉴定意见类证据在基本特点、形成机理等方面存在显著区别,有必要构建符合人脸识别证据特点的证据规则。我国应理性看待现行鉴定意见规范,适度参考域外规则的合理内核,从取证、举证与质证、认证三方面构建刑事诉讼中的人脸识别证据规则。 Face recognition evidence has been practically applied in the field of criminal justice in China, but it has not independently demonstrated its proof function in the process of proof, cross-examination and authentication, showing a tacit existence and default state.Based on the formation mechanism of face recognition evidence and its characteristics of scientificity, probability, reexamination and information connection, face recognition evidence can be positioned as the form of appraisal opinion.However, there are significant differences between face recognition evidence and typical appraisal opinion evidence in basic nature, characteristics, methods and so on, which indicates that it is necessary to construct evidence rules in line with the characteristics of face recognition evidence.American academic circles have discussed how to regulate the practical application of face recognition evidence from the aspects of evidence collection, cross-examination and authentication.Our country should treat the current standard of appraisal opinion rationally, and at the same time draw lessons from the reasonable kernel of the rules outside the domain to construct the evidence rules of face recognition evidence from the two aspects of evidence ability and proof power.
作者 赵敏 Zhao Min
出处 《财经法学》 CSSCI 2022年第2期163-175,共13页 Law and Economy
关键词 刑事诉讼 人脸识别证据 鉴定意见 证据规则 criminal procedure face recognition evidence appraisal opinion evidence rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

  • 1苏力.法律与科技问题的法理学重构[J].中国社会科学,1999(5):57-71. 被引量:185
  • 2[美]肯尼斯·R·福斯特,彼得·W·休伯.对科学证据的认定:科学证据与联邦法院[M].王增森.北京:法律出版社,2001.
  • 31999年9月最高人民检察院《关于CPS多道心理测试能否作为诉讼证据使用问题的批复》.
  • 4[美]乔恩·华尔兹.刑事证据大全[M].何家弘,译.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1993.
  • 5黄维智.刑事案件中“情况说明”的适当定位[J].法学,2007(7):153-159. 被引量:51
  • 6Mattox v. U. S. 156 U.S. 237 (1895).
  • 7Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (1965).
  • 8Barber v. Page, 390 U. S. 719 ( 1968 ).
  • 9California v. Green, 399 U. S. 149(1970).
  • 10Dutton v. Evans, 400 U. S. 74(1970).

共引文献232

同被引文献73

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部