期刊文献+

英汉科技论文报道动词的对比及互译

Contrastive Study of Reporting Verbs in English and Chinese Sci-Tech Articles and Implications for Translation
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用对比修辞理论,对英汉科技论文中的报道动词从分布情况和使用类型的角度进行对比研究。研究结果表明:英语论文作者使用篇章动词较多,而汉语作者使用心理动词略多。英语作者倾向使用积极动词和消极动词,而汉语作者倾向使用中性动词。最后,通过英汉科技论文报道动词的对比研究结果,总结几点报道动词互译策略。 This paper uses the theory of contrastive rhetoric to make a comparative study of reporting verbs in English and Chinese scientific and technological articles from the aspects of distribution and types.The results show that English authors use more textual verbs,while Chinese authors use more mental verbs.English authors tend to use positive verbs and negative verbs,while Chinese authors tend to use neutral verbs.At last,some translation strategies of reporting verbs have been summarized from this comparative analysis.
作者 雷黎 LEI Li
机构地区 湖南信息学院
出处 《中国科技翻译》 2022年第1期13-15,共3页 Chinese Science & Technology Translators Journal
基金 2018年湖南省教育厅科学研究项目“对比修辞视阈下英汉科技论文中报道动词的对比研究”(项目编号:18C1579)。
关键词 英汉科技论文 报道动词 互译 English and Chinese scientific and technological articles reporting verbs translation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1吉晓霞.学术论文中的转述动词[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2006,20(2):104-108. 被引量:11
  • 2胡志清,蒋岳春.中外英语硕士论文转述动词对比研究[J].语言研究,2007,27(3):123-126. 被引量:27
  • 3Hyland,K. Activity and evaluation:Reporting practices in academic writing[A].London:Longman,2002.
  • 4Hyland,K. English for Academic Purposes[M].London andNew York:Routledge,2006.
  • 5Myers G. The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Writing[J].Applied Linguistics,1989,(10):1-35.
  • 6Borg,E. Citation practices in academic writing[A].Reading,UK:CALS,The University of Reading,2000.14-25.
  • 7Campbell,C. Writing with others' words:Using background reading text in academic compositions[A].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
  • 8Thompson,G.,Y.,Y. Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers[J].Applied Linguistics,1991,(04):365-382.
  • 9Thomas,S.H,Thomas P. Reporting Verbs in Medical Journal Articles[J].English For Specific Purposes,1994,(02):129-148.
  • 10Hunston,S. Professional conflict:disagreement in s cademic discourse[A].Amsterdam:Benjamins,1993.115-134.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部