摘要
对我国大学生微信交际中所产生的异议展开语用研究,既可以拓展现有异议研究的视角,又可以丰富数字化语境下汉语语用实证研究成果。本文采集真实的聊天记录作为异议研究语料,并收集学生对不同社交距离异议冒犯程度的评价。研究发现,就大学生而言,与同伴的亲疏关系对异议发起人选择异议策略的影响甚微,但会显著影响听话人对异议冒犯程度的评价。此外,本研究还发现,在微信语境下,异议表达呈现出新的语言特征,诸如表情包的使用、语码转换等,这些特征具有辅助修饰异议强烈程度的语用功能。
Research on the disagreement among Chinese college students on WeChat can both expand the perspective of existing disagreement studies and enrich the empirical studies of Chinese pragmatics in digital contexts.This article collected authentic chat records as a corpus for disagreement research and students’evaluation of the degree of offence caused by disagreements across different social distances.The findings indicate that the social distance between interlocutors had little effect on the choice of disagreement strategies by the initiator,but it significantly affected the audience’s evaluation of the degree of disagreement offence.In addition,new features of expressions were found in the WeChat disagreement,such as emojis and code-switching,which serve to modify the pragmatic function of disagreement.
出处
《复旦外国语言文学论丛》
2021年第2期18-25,共8页
Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature
基金
教育部考试中心——英国文化教育协会英语测评科研课题重点项目(项目编号:EARG2020009)的阶段性成果。
关键词
异议
微信
亲疏关系
语用策略
评价
disagreement
WeChat
social distance
pragmatic strategy
evaluation