摘要
关于南海地区海洋地物的法律地位和海洋权利问题的争议是南海仲裁案实体裁决引人注目的焦点之一。本评述整理了2016年至2021年的英文学术文献中国际和国内学者的广泛讨论,尤其关注仲裁庭解释和适用《联合国海洋法公约》第121条(以下简称“第121条”)的裁决内容。本文从裁决内容及其产生的法律影响的角度展开,一方面评述关于第121条解释和适用的学术讨论进展,另一方面评述该裁决潜在法律影响的学术研究成果。本文认为,关于争议岛礁法律地位和海洋权利的裁决在学界存在很大争议,部分学者认为裁决的分析思路和结论存在瑕疵,并对裁决所产生的潜在负面影响表达了担忧。
One of the eye-catching focuses of the Merits Award of the South China Sea(SCS)Arbitration is the legal status and maritime entitlements of disputed maritime features in the SCS.This review examines the English academic literature from 2016 to 2021,pays particular attention to the Tribunal’s Award under the interpretation and application of Article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS),and summarizes extensive discussions among international and domestic scholars.This paper focuses on the content of the Award and its legal impacts.On the one hand,it reviews the academic literature on the interpretation and application of Article 121 of UNCLOS,on the other hand,it reviews the academic literature on potential legal impacts of the Award.This review indicates that the Award on the legal status and maritime entitlements of disputed maritime features are very controversial,and many scholars consider that the reasoning and conclusion of the final ruling are flawed,and express their concerns about potential negative influences of the Award.
作者
徐奇
XU Qi(Law School of Jinan University)
出处
《中华海洋法学评论》
2021年第4期73-137,共65页
China Oceans Law Review
关键词
南海仲裁案
实体裁决
岛礁地位
海洋权利
文献评述
The South China Sea Arbitration
Merits Award
Legal status
Maritime
Entitlement
Literature review