期刊文献+

基于证据推理的改进加权CREAM模型 被引量:2

Improved Weighted CREAM Model based on Evidential Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为弥补传统认知可靠性与失误分析方法(CREAM)的缺陷,提高人因失误概率(HEP)的计算精度,提出一种基于证据推理(ER)的改进CREAM模型。该模型首先通过决策实验室分析法(DEMATEL)和模糊层次分析法来分别计算共同绩效条件(CPC)的相关性权重和重要性权重;然后利用组合赋权法将两种权重线性组合,获得CPC的综合权重,在此基础上利用ER算法对CPC的绩效效应进行加权数据融合,并利用融合后的数据获取情景影响指数(CII),通过CII实现了HEP点值的输出;最后将该改进的CREAM模型应用到高速铁路列车调度员的人因可靠性定量评估案例中,以验证模型的有效性。案例评估结果表明:调度员在“设置临时限速”时的认知行为控制模式为战术型,HEP值为3.522×10^(-3),并通过与其他方法的对比分析,验证了该模型的有效性和可行性。 In order to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method(CREAM)and improve the calculation accuracy of the Human Error Probability(HEP),this paper proposes an improved CREAM model based on Evidential Reasoning(ER).The model first calculates the relevance and importance weight of the Common Performance Condition(CPC)through the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory(DEMATEL)and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,and then linearly combines the two weights to obtain the combination of CPC Weights by the combination weighting method.On this basis,the paper performs weighted data fusion on the performance effects of CPC through ER algorithm,obtains the contextual impact index(CII)based on the fused data,and realizes the point value output of HEP through CII.Finally,the improved CREAM model is applied to quantitative assessment of human reliability of high-speed railway train dispatchers.The results show that the cognitive behavior control mode of the dispatchers when“setting temporary speed limit”is tactical,and the HEP value is 3.522×10^(-3).Through comparison with other methods,the paper verifies the effectiveness and feasibility of the model.
作者 孙延浩 张涛 刘宁馨 李伟 SUN Yanhao;ZHANG Tao;LIU Ningxin;LI Wei(Signal&Communication Research Institute,China Academy of Railway Sciences Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100081,China;The Center of National Railway Intelligent Transportation System Engineering and Technology,Beijing 100081,China;Transportation&Economics Research Institute,China Academy of Railway Sciences Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100081,China;Beijing Huatie Information Technology Co.,Ltd.,100081,China)
出处 《安全与环境工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期16-22,31,共8页 Safety and Environmental Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U1834211) 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司科研资助项目(2021YJ097)。
关键词 认知可靠性与失误分析方法(CREAM) 人因可靠性评估 人因失误概率(HEP) 证据推理 共同绩效条件(CPC) 情景影响指数(CII) Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method(CREAM) Human reliability assessment Human Error Probability(HEP) Evidential Reasoning(ER) Common Performance Condition(CPC) Context Influence Index(CII)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1王遥,沈祖培.CREAM——第二代人因可靠性分析方法[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(3):17-21. 被引量:43
  • 2李克武,郭建胜,周长飞.航空维修人为因素事故分析系统研究[J].航空维修与工程,2005(6):42-43. 被引量:16
  • 3中国民用航空总局人为因素课题组.民用航空人的因素培训手册[M].北京:中国民航出版社,2003:47-51
  • 4Hawkins F H. Human Factors in Flight[M]. London: Gower Technical Press, 1990: 35 -63.
  • 5Willpert B, Klumb P. Social dynamics, organization and management factors contributing to system safety[ C]. Reliability and Safety in Hazardous Work System Hove,1993: 87 -99.
  • 6Orasanu J, Connolly T. The reinvention of decision making[C]. School Administrator, 1993: 3 -20.
  • 7Diehl A. Human performance/system safety issues in aircraft accident investigation and prevention[C] Proceedings of Fifth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 1989:838 -847.
  • 8LI Wen-chin, Harris D. Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents[J]. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 2006, 77(10): 1 056- 1 061.
  • 9Hollnael E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method [M]. Oxford( UK "): Elsevier Science Ltd. 1998:55 -86.
  • 10Liu B. Uncertainty Theory [M]. Beijing: Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, 2012: 15 -26.

共引文献10

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部