期刊文献+

地面堆载对坚硬地基和软土地基中沟埋式天然气管道的影响差异评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of the Effect of Landfilling on Trenching Natural Gas Pipelines with Solid Foundation and Soft Foundation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长输油气管道上方弃土堆载现象是管道管理中常遇到的问题。考虑坚硬地基和软土地基两种情形,计算上方堆载土引起的沟埋式管道附加荷载及附加位移,结合有限元数值模拟方法,给出我国常用管径沟埋式输气管道所能承受的最大地上荷载及等效堆载土高度,并分析了其地面影响因素。结果表明:一般坚硬地基中不同规格的沟埋式管道能承受的最大地上荷载为0.27~0.82 MPa,最大堆载高度可达13.4~41.0 m,最大地上载荷与管道壁厚呈正相关,随管径的增大先减小后增大;而一般软土地基中不同规格的沟埋式管道能承受的最大地上荷载约为0.20~0.58 MPa,最大堆载高度为10.1~28.9 m;最大地上载荷与堆载土作用时间和软土层厚度呈负相关,与地基土的压缩模量呈正相关;管道规格相同时,软土地基上的管道能承受的最大地上荷载普遍小于坚硬地基。 Landfill of construction rubbish above long-distance oil and gas pipelines underground becomes a common problem in the realm of pipe management.In consideration of solid foundation and soft foundation,we calculate the additional load and displacement of trenching pipelines caused by landfill combining with the finite element numerical simulation method,offer the maximum upload and the equivalent landfill height of the trenching gas pipelines with common pipe diameter in China,and analyze the influencing factors.The results indicate that the maximum upload that trenching pipes of different specifications can bear is 0.27~0.82 MPa and the equivalent maximum height is 13.4~41.0 m in the ordinary solid foundation.The maximum upload is positively correlated with pipe thickness.It decreases first and then increases with the increase of caliber.In the ordinary soft soil foundation,the maximum upload that trenching pipes of different specifications can bear is 0.20~0.58 MPa,and the equivalent maximum fill heights is 10.1~28.9 m.For pipes of the same specifications,the maximum load and the landfill height in soft foundation are generally smaller than that in solid foundation.The maximum load on the pipelines is negatively correlated with load time and soft soil thickness,and positively correlated with the compression modulus of foundation soil.
作者 詹辉 ZHAN Hui(Jiangxi Province Natural Gas Pipeline Co.,Ltd.,Nanchang 330096,China)
出处 《安全与环境工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期57-63,94,共8页 Safety and Environmental Engineering
关键词 软土地基 坚硬地基 地面堆载 沟埋式天然气管道 差异评价 soft soil foundation solid soil foundation land-fill trenching natural gas pipeline variation evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献54

  • 1李镜培,丁士君.邻近建筑荷载对地下管线的影响分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(12):1553-1557. 被引量:31
  • 2汪定熵,罗毅.地基的基床系数[J].岩土工程技术,1996,10(3):47-51. 被引量:7
  • 3戴宏伟,陈仁朋,陈云敏.地面新施工荷载对临近地铁隧道纵向变形的影响分析研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(3):312-316. 被引量:97
  • 4LIMURA S. Simplified mechanical model for evaluating stress in pipeline subject to settlement [ J ]. Construction and Building Materials, 2004,18 (6) :469-479.
  • 5NOOR Munaz A, DHAR Ashutosh S. Three-dimensional response of buried pipe under vehicle loads: proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction: New Pipeline Technologies, Security, and Safety, July 13-16 2003 [ C ]. American Society of Civil Engineers, c2003.
  • 6Krizek R J,McQuade P V. Bahavior of buried concrete pipe[J].Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1978, 104(GT7) :815 - 836.
  • 7胡南南.城市天然气供应系统的风险评价及防范研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2012.
  • 8中华人民共和国行业标准编写组.GB5007-2011建筑地基基础设计规范[s].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
  • 9曾国熙.垂直荷载下软粘土的侧向变形[J].浙江大学学报,1962,1:93-124.
  • 10TAVENAS F. Lateral displacements in clay foundations under embankments[J]. Canadian Geoteehnieal Journal, 1979, 16(2): 32-55.

共引文献272

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部