期刊文献+

西方《诗经》研究中的讽喻之辩

An Argument of Allegory in the Study of The Book of Songs in the West
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《诗经》自16世纪传入欧美之后,一直受到西方人的关注,其研究热情数百年来依然不减。海外汉学家在对《诗经》进行研究时常常会用到一个关键的术语,即“讽喻”(Allegory),《诗经》传统的“兴”近似于西方叙事作品中的讽喻,因此海外汉学研究者常常把讽喻与“兴”视为同一创作手法。但近年来,《诗经》是否适用于讽喻引起了学者们的极大争论,尤其是《诗经》中超出文本意义的意义化与西方的讽喻研究非常相似,所以目前越来越多的西方学者开始对《诗经》进行讽喻研究。以“西方《诗经》研究中的讽喻之辩”为题,概述了《诗经》在西方的传播,分析了《诗经》的政治隐喻以及其能否作为讽喻研究文本的重要分歧点,并对争论进行反思。 Since The Book of Songs was introduced to Europe and America in the 16th century,it has attracted the attention of westerners all the time,and its research enthusiasm has remained unabated for hundreds of years.When overseas sinologists study The Book of Songs,they often use a key term,namely Allegory.The traditional Xing in The Book of Songs is similar to the allegory in western narrative works,so overseas sinologists often regard allegory and Xing as the same creation technique.However,in recent years,whether The Book of Songs is suitable for allegory has aroused great controversy among scholars.Especially,the meaning beyond the textual meaning in The Book of Songs is very similar to the allegory study in the West,so more and more western scholars are beginning to study allegory in The Book of Songs.With the topic“Argument on allegory in the study of The Book of Songs in the West”,this paper summarizes the spread of The Book of Songs in the West,analyzes the political metaphor of The Book of Songs and the important differences on whether it can act as an allegory study text,and reflects on the argument.
作者 廉鹏 Lian Peng(Faculty of Liberal Arts, Northwest University Xi’an 710068 China)
机构地区 西北大学文学院
出处 《西安文理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第1期26-30,共5页 Journal of Xi’an University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 《诗经》 西方汉学研究 讽喻 The Book of Songs Western Sinology Studies Allegory
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1晁福林.春秋时期礼的发展与社会观念的变迁[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1994(5):47-57. 被引量:31
  • 2贾海生.周公所制乐舞通考[J].文艺研究,2002(3):82-93. 被引量:15
  • 3王大为.马克思恩格斯论语言和思维[J].内蒙古工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,15(1):5-7. 被引量:6
  • 4袁文彬.语言哲学的马克思主义之维[J].自然辩证法通讯,2007,29(3):23-29. 被引量:8
  • 5万云骏.《清真词的比兴与寄托》.《词学》第二辑.华东师范大学出版社,1983年版,第2页.
  • 6Saint Augustine, On Christian Doctrine, Trans. D. W. Robertson, Jr. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1958).
  • 7Morton W. Bloomfield, "Allegory as Interpretation," New Literary History 1. Winter 1972: 301-317.
  • 8Jean Danielou, From Shadow to Reality : Studies in the Biblical Typology of the Fathers, Trans. Wulstan Hibberd (Westminster, Md. : Newman, 1960).
  • 9Paul De Man, Allegories of Reading : Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979).
  • 10Umberto Eeo with Richard Rorty, Jonathan Culler and Christine Brooke-Rose, Interpretation and Overinterpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部