期刊文献+

任务数量与工作记忆容量对交错学习的影响

The Impact of Task Number and Working Memory Capacity on Interleaving Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究以分子结构式为材料,让被试在单任务或双任务条件下以集中呈现和交错呈现的方式进行学习,并通过操作广度、旋转广度和对称广度任务测量工作记忆容量(working memory capacity,WMC),探究在基于规则类别学习中交错呈现优势的稳定性。结果显示,交错呈现优势仅体现在文科生中;而对于理科生,集中呈现效果较佳。另外,任务数量和WMC均不影响交错呈现优势,表明交错呈现优势稳定存在于单任务和双任务条件中,且不同WMC的个体均能从交错学习获益。 The study aimed to investigate the stability of the interleaving effect in rule-based category learning. Participants were asked to learn in single-or dual-task conditions where the stimuli were presented in blocked and interleaved conditions. Operation span,rotation span, and symmetry span tasks were used to measure working memory capacity(WMC). The results showed that those whose majors belonged to the liberal arts were benefited more from the interleaved presentation. In contrast, those whose majors belonged to the sciences benefited from blocking learning. In addition, neither task number nor WMC affected the interleaving effect,indicating that the advantage of interleaving learning is stable in both single and dual-task conditions, and individuals with different WMC benefit from interleaving learning.
作者 王家慰 冼美君 邢强 WANG Jiawei;XIAN Meijun;XING Qiang(Department of Psychology,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006;Department of General Psychology,University of Padova,Padova 35131,Italy)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期15-21,72,共8页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 全国教育科学“十三五”规划项目(BBA200033) 广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划项目(2020GZYB91)。
关键词 交错呈现 双任务 工作记忆容量 学科类型 interleaved presentation dual task working memory capacity subject type
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1宋广文,王瑞明.文理科大学生不同阅读特点的实验研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):151-152. 被引量:9
  • 2Holly, Z. G., Eva, M. D., Nancy, J. M., & Mark, S. S. (2012) . Category formation in autism: Can individuals with autism form categories and prototypes of dot patterns? J Autism Dev Disord, 42, 1694-1704.
  • 3Johnson, M. C. (1999) . The role of conceptual structure and background knowledge in category learning. Dissertation abstracts international section B: the sciences and engineering, 59 (1 I-B) , 6085.
  • 4Kaplan, A. S., & Murphy, G. L. (1999) . The acquisition of category structure in unsupervised learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 699-712.
  • 5Kim, S., & Rehder, B. (2011) . How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: An eye trackingstudy. Memory Cognition, 39, 649-665.
  • 6Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (1997) . Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49-96.
  • 7Murphy, G. L., & Allopenna, P. D. (1994) . The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20 (4) , 904-919.
  • 8Reshanne, R. R., & Marius, V. P. (2013) . The contents of the search template for category-level search in natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 13 (3) , 1-13.
  • 9Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001) . Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journd of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323-360.
  • 10Rehder, B., & Ross, B. H. (2001) . Abstract coherent categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1261-1275.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部