期刊文献+

描述信息与经验不一致对个体风险选择的影响:决策模型的拟合 被引量:1

The Impact of Description-Experience Conflict on Individual Risky Decision-Making:Decision Model Fitting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用描述-经验冲突范式,考察损益情境下,描述信息与经验不一致对个体风险选择的影响,通过模型拟合探究其内在机制。研究1a和研究1b采用单因素被试间设计,自变量为描述信息与经验不一致程度,因变量为风险选项选择率。结果发现,获益情境中,描述信息与经验不一致程度的主效应不显著;而损失情境中,风险选项选择率受到显著影响。研究2比较决策模型参数发现,获益情境中,描述信息权重参数ξ和选择一致性参数c显著小于损失情境,而近因参数?显著大于损失情境。这表明,当描述信息与经验不一致时,相对于获益情境,损失情境下个体更大程度地采用描述信息进行决策。研究揭示了损益情境中描述信息与经验不一致影响个体风险选择的机制。 This study used the description-experience conflict paradigm to investigate the influence of description-experience inconsistency on individual risk choices in gain and loss situations, and explore its internal mechanism through decision model fitting. Both Study1a and Study 1b adopted a single-factor between-subjects design. The independent variable was the degree of inconsistency between description and experience, and the dependent variable was the proportion of risky choices(R-rate). Results showed that in gain situations, the R-rate was not significantly influenced by degree of inconsistency between description and experience;while in the loss situations, the R-rate was significantly influenced. Study 2 found that the description’s weight parameter(ξ) in the gain situations was significantly smaller than that in the loss situations;while the recency parameter(?) was significantly larger than that in the loss situations. Therefore, under the condition of description-experience inconsistency, the individuals in loss situations were more inclined to make decisions based on the descriptive information than those in the gain situations.
作者 周广方 魏子晗 欧阳良媛 Ngure Mary Muthoni 王晓庄 ZHOU Guangfang;WEI Zihan;OUYANG Liangyuan;NGURE Mary Muthoni;WANG Xiaozhuang(Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education,Academy of Psychology and Behavior,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387;Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’Mental Development and Learning,Tianjin 300387;Tianjin Vocational College of Mechanics and Electricity,Tianjin 300350)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期29-36,共8页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 天津市哲学社会科学规划课题(TJJX18-012)。
关键词 损益情境 描述决策 经验决策 决策模型 gain and loss situation decision from description decision from experience decision model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献85

  • 1于窈,李纾.“过分自信”的研究及其跨文化差异[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):468-474. 被引量:25
  • 2Agarwal, S., & Mazumder, B. (2013). Cognitive abilities and household financial decision making. American Economic Journal." Applied Economics, 5(1), 193-207.
  • 3Bauer, A. S., Timpe, J. C., Edmonds, E. C., Bechara, A., Tranel,D., & Denburg, N. L. (2013). Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Age-related changes in decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task. Emotion, 13(1), 19-24.
  • 4Bellante, D., & Green, C. A. (2004). Relative risk aversion among the elderly. Review of Financial Economics, 13(3), 269-281.
  • 5Blanchard-Fields, F. (2007). Everyday problem solving and emotion: An adult developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 26-31.
  • 6Blanchard-Fields, F., Mienaltowski, A., & Seay, R. B. (2007) Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: Older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(1), P61 464.
  • 7Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 92(5), 938-956.
  • 8Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2012). Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), 352-360.
  • 9Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913-1915.
  • 10Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123.

共引文献170

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部