期刊文献+

Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new sweptsource optical coherence tomography biometer 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:To evaluate the effect of orthokeratology on precision of measurements in children using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography(SS-OCT)optical biometer(OA-2000),and agreement between its measurements and those provided by the commonly used IOLMaster based on partial coherence interferometry(PCI).Methods:This study recruited fifty-one eyes of 51 normal children(8–16 years).An operator took measurements with the two biometers.Then,a second operator took measurements with the SS-OCT biometer.After orthokeratology was performed for one month,the same operators repeated the same procedures.Axial length(AL),mean keratometry(Km)at 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm diameters(Km2.5 and Km3.0),central corneal thickness(CCT),anterior chamber depth(ACD),lens thickness(LT)and corneal diameter(CD)were analyzed.Results:With the SS-OCT optical biometer,the test-retest repeatability of AL measurements was<0.06 mm.For all parameters,the coefficients of variation were<1.23%and the intraclass correlation coefficients were>0.95.The 95%limits of agreement of difference between the two devices for CD parameter were up to 1.53 mm.After orthokeratology,the fluctuation ranges of difference for Km3.0 measurement was 1.11 times higher than before orthokeratology,while the absolute values of difference for AL,Km2.5,ACD and CD measurements were comparable.Conclusions:Before and after orthokeratology,the SS-OCT biometer showed high repeatability and reproducibility for all measurements.Wearing orthokeratology contact lenses affected the agreement between SS-OCT and PCI biometers for Km3.0 measurements.The CD measurement showed poor agreement between the two devices.
出处 《Eye and Vision》 SCIE CSCD 2020年第1期119-127,共9页 眼视光学杂志(英文)
基金 This work was supported in part by the Foundation of Wenzhou City Science&Technology Bureau(Y20180174) Medical and Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province(2019KY111) Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program(2018C03012) Zhejiang Provincial High-level Talents Program(2017-102) The funders had no role in the study design,data collection and analysis,decision to publish,or preparation of the manuscript The contribution of G.B.Bietti Foundation IRCCS was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health and Fondazione Roma.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1Frisch I, Rabsilber 3', Becker K, Reuland A, Auffarth G. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Orbscan II and IOLMaster. Eur J Ophthalmol2007; 17 (3):327- 331.
  • 2Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Folouhi A. Anterior chamber depth measurement with a-scan ultrasonography, Orbsean H, and IOLMaster. Optom Vis Sci2005;82(10):900-904.
  • 3Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh M, Zamani M, Ghoreyshi M, Salouli R. Comparison of horizontal corneal diameter measurements using (;alilei, EyeSys and Orbscan II systems.Clin Exp Optom, 2009;92(5):429-433.
  • 4Doors M, Cruysberg L, Berendsehot T, de Brabander J, Verbakel F, Webers C, Nuijts t/. Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements using three imaging technologies in normal eyes and after phakic intraooular lens implantation.Graefes ArchClin Exp Ophthalmol 2009 ;247(8): 1139-1146.
  • 5Nemeth G, Vajas A, Kolozsvari B, Berta A, Modis l,J. Anterior chamber depth measurements in phakie and pseudophakic eyes: Pentaeam versus ultrasound device. J Catact Refract Surg , 2006;32(8):1331-1335.
  • 6Savant V, Chavan R, Pushpoth S, Ilango B. Comparability and intra-/interobserver reliability of anterior chamber depth measurements with the Pentacam and IOLMaster. J Refract Surg2008;24(6):615-618.
  • 7Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Skorpik C. Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan.Optom Vis Sci2005;82(9):858-861.
  • 8Reuland M, Reuland A, Nishi Y, Auffarth G. Corneal radii and anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLmaster versus the Pentacam. J Rcfracl Surg 2007;23(4):368-373.
  • 9Rosa N, Lanza M, Capasso L, Lucci M, Polito B, Romano A. Anterior chamber depth measurement before and after photorefractive kerateetomy: comparison between IOL master and Orbsean H. Ophthalmology 2006;113 (6):962-969.
  • 10Woodmass J, Rocha G. A comparison of Scheimpflug imaging simulated and Holladay equivalent keratometry values with partial coherence interferometry keratometry measurements in phakic eyes. Can J Ophthalmol2009;44(6):700-704.

共引文献19

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部