期刊文献+

城市快速路互通立交分流区交通冲突预测模型 被引量:7

The Predicting Model of Traffic Conflicts in Diverging Segments of Expressway Interchange
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究互通立交分流区交通冲突特性,确保车辆的安全运行,提升通行效率,分别选取TTC和PET模型作为判定追尾冲突和换道冲突的标准,通过对交通流和交通冲突数据的分析,拟合出预测交通冲突发生概率的二分类Logistic回归模型。研究结果表明:分流区交通冲突发生数不仅随着交通流率的增加而上升,还受到车辆驶入分流区时所处的位置、换道频次和速度的影响,此外,冲突与非冲突车辆的车头时距之间也存在着显著的差异性。 In order to study the traffic conflicts characteristics of interchanges diverging segment,and to ensure the safe operation of vehicles and improve the traffic efficiency,the TTC and PET models were selected respectively as criterions to judge rear-end collision and lane changing collision,traffic flow and traffic conflict data were analyzed by various statistical means,and a binary Logistic regression model was also constructed to predict the probability of traffic conflict.The results show that the occurrence of traffic conflicts in the diverging segment not only increases with the increase of traffic flow rate,but also is affected by the position,lane change frequency and speed of vehicles when entering the diverging segment.In addition,there is a significant difference between the time headway of conflicted and non-conflicted vehicles.
作者 张卫华 陶虎 陈乾 ZHANG Weihua;TAO Hu;CHEN Qian(College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China)
出处 《公路工程》 2022年第1期149-155,共7页 Highway Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51878236) 合肥市重点工程建设管理局科研项目(2019FFCJ4364)。
关键词 快速路 互通立交 交通冲突 二分类Logistic回归模型 expressway interchange traffic conflict binary logistic model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1景春光,王殿海.典型交叉口混合交通冲突分析与处理方法[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(6):97-100. 被引量:53
  • 2CJJ129-2009城市快速路设计规程[S].
  • 3WANG Ying. Research on Minimum Distance between Interchanges on Urban Expressway [D[. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2006.
  • 4GAO Lu-bin, SUN Jia-si, ZHANG Ming. Research on interchange density of chongqing ring highway [ J ]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University : Natural Science Edition, 2010, 29( 1 ) : 45 - 48.
  • 5Ray B L, Schoen J, Jenior P, et al. Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing[ R]. Washington, DC : Transportation Research Board, 2011.
  • 6Pilko Peter, Bared Joe G, Edara Praveen K, et al. Safety assessment of interchange spacing on urban freeways : Enhanced models[C]. Transportation Research Board 86'h Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Washington DC, United States, 2007:07 - 0313.
  • 7Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual[M]. Washington D. C: Transportation Research Board, 2000: 24 - 1 -24 -39.
  • 8Hidas P. Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving[J]. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies, 2005, 13 ( 1 ) :37 - 62.
  • 9Hidas P. Modelling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation[JT. Transportation Research Part C-E- merin Technologies, 2002, 10(5 -6) :351 -371.
  • 10Gettman D, Pu L, Sayed T, et al. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation[R[. Washington, DC: Transporta- tion Research Board, 2008.

共引文献55

同被引文献72

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部