期刊文献+

基于ASTEC程序的乏燃料水池严重事故研究

Study on Severe Accident Occurred in Spent Fuel Pool Based on ASTEC Code
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了更深入地理解核电厂乏燃料水池严重事故的进程和后果,基于ASTEC程序建立了某型三代核电机组乏燃料水池严重事故分析模型,根据该模型,分别对正常运行,正常换料和异常换料三种不同运行状态下的长期丧失电源(SBO)和长期丧失电源叠加冷却管线破口(SBO+LOCA)所导致的严重事故进行了分析。分析结果表明,乏燃料水池事故进程相对缓慢,有较大的时间窗口来进行应对。而当乏燃料组件发生裸露和损伤后,将产生大量的氢气和释放大量的裂变产物。通常来说,电厂设计中没有相应的缓解措施能够应对这种情况。此外,在本文研究过程中,还发现了ASTEC程序在模拟乏燃料水池的一些程序特点。 In order to better understand the process and consequences of nuclear power plant(NNP)spent fuel pool severe accident,severe accident analysis model based on ASTEC code for one of third generation NNPs spent fuel pool is established.According the model,loss of cooling(SBO)and loss of coolant inventory with loss of cooling(SBO+LOCA)are analysed in different conditions that are normal operation condition,normal refuelling condition and abnormal refuelling condition respectively.The results show that the progression of accident in spent fuel pool is quite slow and there is a lot of time to respond and mitigate.However,the hydrogen production is extremely high and the radioactive releases are extremely high which is un-acceptable to workers and public after the fuel assemblies are uncovered and damaged.No mitigation measures are in general available to handle such severe consequences.Moreover,the features of ASTEC code to model the spent fuel pool severe accident is also discovered during this study.
作者 廖飞页 陈文虎 郭超 贺东钰 陈鹏 LIAO Feiye;CHEN Wenhu;GUO Chao;HE Dongyu;CHEN Peng(China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute,Shenzhen of Guangdong Prov.518031,China)
出处 《核科学与工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期199-206,共8页 Nuclear Science and Engineering
基金 国家重点研发计划严重事故管理和不确定性(MUSA)(2019YFE0194200)项目资助。
关键词 乏燃料水池 严重事故 ASTEC 氢气 裂变产物 Spent fuel pool Severe accident ASTEC Hydrogen Fission products
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1郑启燕,施仲齐,王醒宇.核电站乏燃料水池遭受恐怖袭击后果评价[J].辐射防护,2005,25(1):45-50. 被引量:4
  • 2广东核电培训中心.900MW压水堆核电站系统与设备[M].北京:原子能出版社,2006.
  • 3MILLER C, CUBBAGE A. The near-term task force review of insights from the Fukushima Dai- Ichi accident[R]. USA: NRC, 2011.
  • 4I NEI 06-i2, B. 5. b phase 2 3 submittal guide- lines, revision 2[R]. USA: NEI, 2006.
  • 5AP1000 design control document (Rev. 19)[M]. USA: Westinghouse Company, 2011.
  • 6RASMUSSEN N. Reactor safety study: An as- sessment of accident risks in U. S. commercial nuclear power plants, NUREG-75/014[-R]. USA: NRC, 1975.
  • 7ALLAN S B, DAVID J M, DANA A P, et al. Spent fuel heatup following loss of water during storage, NUREG/CR-O649[R]. USA: SNL, 1979.
  • 8SAILOR V L, PERKINS K R, WEEKS J R, et al. Severe accidents in spent fuel pools in support of generic safety, NUREG/CR-4982[R]. USA: BNL, 1987.
  • 9JASON H S. Assessment of offsite consequences for a severe spent fuel pool accident, SMSAB-99- 02[R]. USA: NRC, 1999.
  • 10JOJ H, ROSEPF, UNWINSD, etal. Value/ impact analyses of accident preventive and mitiga- tive options for spent fuel pools, NUREG/CR- 5281[R]. USA.. NRC, 1989.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部