金毓黻著《东北通史》的学术批评及回应

Academic Criticism and Response of Jin Yufu's General History of Northeast China

《东北通史》出版后,有批评者提出15个问题指出该书史料运用不严谨,对重要地名的考证失之模糊,对重要事件的记载存在遗漏,尤其缺少记述东北社会经济文化演进真相,以及东北与全国铸为一体的内容。金毓黻先生撰文予以回击。他指出学术批评的态度应是抱持善意,备列优点之后再举其不足,在方法上应观其大。《东北通史》解决了数十个东北史地纠结难解的问题,将会成为研究东北史的参考书。这场学术争论涉及东北史研究的史料甄别、材料取舍、东北史的写作方法以及学术批评的态度等问题,对于我们研究东北史学学术史具有重要参考意义。

After the publication of General History of Northeast China written by Mr.Jin Yufu,a scholar named"Wen Hou"put forward 15 questions for criticism,including the textual analysis of historical materials and the writing style of northeast history.Mr.Jin Yufu thought that the criticism was picky and lacked goodwill,so he wrote an article to fight back.This academic case involves the selection of historical materials,the choice of materials,the writing styles of northeast history and the attitude to academic criticism.It has an important reference significance for us to think deeply about the research methods of northeast history.