“刑事诉讼目的双重论”批判——以“刑事诉讼目的”概念界定为切入点

On the Rethinking of the Problems Contained in"The Theory of the Dual Purpose of Criminal Proceedings"——Starting from the Definition of"the Purpose of Criminal Proceedings"

在“刑事诉讼目的”概念的界定上,“刑事诉讼目的双重论”主要存在以下两个问题:一是对“刑事诉讼目的”缺乏清晰准确的界定,二是混同“刑事诉讼目的”与“刑事诉讼模式”。前者导致其结论的得出偏离前提,后者导致其错误吸收刑事诉讼模式理论的相关观点,并最终得出“刑事诉讼法目的在于惩罚犯罪和保障人权”这个错误结论,该结论在我国刑事诉讼领域产生较大的负面影响。对“刑事诉讼目的”之界定,应明确限定于“刑事诉讼法目的”这个范围,对该目的内容之确定,则应注意其与刑法目的的区别。刑法目的在于惩罚和预防犯罪,而刑事诉讼法目的则在于既查明案件真相、准确适用刑法,又维护司法公正、保障人权。

In the definition of the concept of the purpose of criminal procedure,the dual theory of the purpose of criminal procedure mainly has the following two problemsThere are two main problems in the definition of the concept of"the purpose of criminal proceedings"in"the theory of the dual purpose of criminal proceedings"in China.One is the lack of a clear and accurate boundary in"the purpose of criminal proceedings";the other is confusing"the purpose of criminal proceedings"with"the mode of criminal procedure".The former leads to the conclusion deviating from the premise,while the latter leads to the erroneous absorption of the relevant views of the criminal procedure model theory,and finally comes to the wrong conclusion that"the purpose of the criminal procedure law is to punish crimes and protect human rights".The conclusion has a great negative impact on the field of criminal procedure in China The definition of"the purpose of criminal proceedings"should be clearly limited in the scope of"the purpose of criminal procedure law".When determining the content of the purpose,we should pay attention to the differences between the purpose of criminal procedure law and the purpose of criminal law.The purpose of criminal law is to punish and prevent crimes,while the purpose of criminal procedure law is not only to find out the truth of cases and apply criminal law accurately,but also to safeguard judicial justice and human rights.