期刊文献+

美国国际气候政策的连续性与稳定性——以美国国际发展金融公司的气候政策为例

The Continuity and Stability of U.S.International Climate Policy--A Case Study of America’s International Development Finance Corporation’s Climate Policy
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪90年代以来,美国国际气候政策发生数次根本性调整。相对于白宫国际气候立场的易变性与波动性,美国联邦机构的气候政策表现出较强的连续性与稳定性。美国国际发展金融公司作为美国重要的国际发展机构和国际气候融资机构,其气候政策与白宫的气候立场在一定程度上并不同步。这主要受其自身国际地位、联邦政策变化、国会权衡取舍、国内环保理念、国际同行竞争等多种因素影响。《巴黎协定》达成之前,美国国际发展金融公司的气候行动曾在国际同行中遥遥领先。《巴黎协定》达成之后,相较于全球同类机构纷纷顺势而为增强气候行动的力度,美国国际发展金融公司未能及时更新其气候政策,从而显得行动滞后。预计未来,在拜登政府推进国际气候政策、国际同行竞争压力加大的共同作用下,美国国际发展金融公司将进一步加强其气候行动。 Since the 1990s, several fundamental changes have taken place in U.S. international climate policy. Compared to the volatility and instability of the White House’s international climate position, the climate policy of U.S.federal agencies shows strong continuity and stability. As an important international development finance institution and an international climate institution, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation’s climate policy is not completely consistent with the White House’s position. This is a result of the Corporation’s own international strength, changes in federal policies, trade-offs in Congress, domestic environmental practices, and international competition. Before the Paris Agreement, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation was far ahead of its international counterparts in climate action. After the Paris Agreement, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation failed to update its climate policy, thus appearing to be lagging behind. It is expected that in the future, with the Biden administration’s international climate policy advancement and intense international competition, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation will further strengthen its climate action.
作者 赵行姝 Zhao Xingshu
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期103-129,7,共28页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献99

  • 1顾学稼.自然资源保护与西奥多·罗斯福[J].美国研究,1987,1(1):96-112. 被引量:7
  • 2滕海键.略论美国现代史上的三次环保运动[J].赤峰学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,27(1):11-13. 被引量:7
  • 3Hearing on Oil Profits and Subsidies: Solis's Questions, April 1, 20081 http: //hk. youtube. com/watch? v= mNFJk0JkHyc& feature= related.
  • 4"Exxon to Cut Funding to Climate Change Denial Groups", http: //www. guardian. co. uk/environment/2008/may/28/elimatechange. fossilfuels
  • 5张孟军.《美企业先政府一步积极减排温室气体》.《科技日报》,2005年12月5日.
  • 6PRNewswire (United Business Media), "Ceres Report Ranks DuPont # 1 in U. S. , # 2 Globally on ClimateC hange". http: //sev. prnewswire. com/chemical/20060321/PHTU01921032006-1. html
  • 7Ceres, 2008 Investor Summit on Climate Risk : Final Report, 2008. http: //www. ceres. org/NETCOMMUNITY/Document. Doc? id=831
  • 8《欧盟减排新目标雄心勃勃》.中国能源网,2007年3月13日.http://www.chirta5e.com/news/huanbao/200703/200703130134.html.
  • 92008, Climate Action and Renewable Energy Package. http: //www. europeanenergyforum. eu/archives/european-union/eu-general-topic-file/eu-environment/third-energy-package-climate-action- and-renewable-energy.
  • 10109th Congress, Aug. 8, 2005, Public Law 109 - 58: Energy Policy Act of 2005. http: // www. epa. gov/oust/fedlaws/publ _ 109-058. pdf.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部