深刻理解“两个必然”的科学内涵——兼评科恩对科学社会主义的质疑

Theoretical and Practical Proof of“Two Necessities”:Also on Cohen’s Questioning of Scientific Socialism

自苏联社会主义模式失败之后,对“两个必然”科学论断的质疑便纷至沓来,其中西方马克思主义者科恩就指出,“资本主义必然灭亡、社会主义必然胜利”的社会历史必然性论断因囿于黑格尔辩证法思想的窠臼之中,其核心理路“政治分娩论”的思想是值得商榷的。需要指出的是,科恩对社会历史必然性的评判显然存在误读。在中国特色社会主义发展的今天,重思科恩对“两个必然”质疑的逻辑理路,从理论之维和时代发展的双重视阈下予以回应和澄清,不仅可以化解科恩对社会历史必然性的诘责,还有利于深刻把握历史发展的本真意蕴,证明走中国特色社会主义道路是历史的必然选择。

Since the failure of the Soviet model of socialism,there have been many doubts about the scientific thesis of the“two necessities”.Among them,the Western Marxist Cohen pointed out that the social and historical inevitability of“capitalism will inevitably die and socialism will inevitably triumph”is confined to Hegel’s dialectic thinking,and its core rationale“political childbirth theory”is debatable.What needs to be pointed out is that Cohen’s judgment on social and historical inevitability is obviously misunderstood.Today,with the development of socialism with Chinese characteristics,the logical reasoning of Koen’s questioning of the“two necessities”is emphasized,and the response and clarification from the dual emphasis on the development of the era of theoretical peacekeeping can not only resolve the condemnation of the social and historical inevitability,but also helps us to deeply grasp the true meaning of historical development,and proves that taking the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics is a historical choice.