期刊文献+

Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO_(2)Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 The objective of this paper is to understand the benefits that one can achieve for large-scale supercritical CO_(2)(S-CO_(2))coal-fired power plants.The aspects of energy environment and economy of 1000 MW S-CO_(2)coal-fired power generation system and 1000 MW ultra-supercritical(USC)water-steam Rankine cycle coal-fired power generation system are analyzed and compared at the similar main vapor parameters,by adopting the neural network genetic algorithm and life cycle assessment(LCA)methodology.Multi-objective optimization of the 1000 MW S-CO_(2)coal-fired power generation system is further carried out.The power generation efficiency,environmental impact load,and investment recovery period are adopted as the objective functions.The main vapor parameters of temperature and pressure are set as the decision variables.The results are concluded as follows.First,the total energy consumption of the S-CO_(2)coal-fired power generation system is 10.48 MJ/k Wh and the energy payback ratio is 34.37%.The performance is superior to the USC coal-fired power generation system.Second,the resource depletion index of the S-CO_(2)coal-fired power generation system is 4.38μPRchina,90,which is lower than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system,and the resource consumption is less.Third,the environmental impact load of the S-CO_(2)coal-fired power generation system is 0.742 m PEchina,90,which is less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system,0.783 m PEchina,90.Among all environmental impact types,human toxicity potential HTP and global warming potential GWP account for the most environmental impact.Finally,the investment cost of the S-CO_(2)coal-fired power generation system is generally less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system because the cost of the S-CO_(2)turbine is only half of the cost of the steam turbine.The optimal turbine inlet temperature T_(5)becomes smaller,and the optimal turbine inlet pressure is unchanged at 622.082°C/30 MPa.
出处 《Journal of Thermal Science》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2022年第2期463-484,共22页 热科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFB0601801) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51806165)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献48

  • 1冯伟忠.900MW超临界机组FCB试验[J].中国电力,2005,38(2):74-77. 被引量:55
  • 2狄向华,聂祚仁,左铁镛.中国火力发电燃料消耗的生命周期排放清单[J].中国环境科学,2005,25(5):632-635. 被引量:141
  • 3赵飞,周渝慧.节能自愿协议在火电行业的应用[J].电力需求侧管理,2007,9(1):73-76. 被引量:6
  • 4U. S. EPA. LCA 101 [EB/OL]. 2006. http://www, epa. gov/ NRMRL/lcaccess/lca101. html. 2008 - 12 - 29.
  • 5AA. Life Cycle Inventory Report for the North American Aluminum Industry[R]. Washington, DC, 1998.
  • 6IAI. Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminium: Inventory Data for the Worldwide Primary Aluminum Industry [EB/OL]. London, 2003.http://www, world - aluminium, org/cache/f10000108, pdf. 2006 - 07 - 06.
  • 7IAI. Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminiura: Inventory Data for the Worldwide Primary Aluminum Industry[EB/OL] . London, 2007. http://www, world - aluminium, org/cache/fl0000166, pdf. 2008 - 05 - 05.
  • 8EAA. Environmental Profile Report for the European Aluminium Industry: Life Cycle Inventory Data for Aluminium Production and Transformation Processes in Europe [EB/OL]. 2008. http:// www. eaa. net/upL/4/en/doc/EAA-Environmental-profile-report- May08. pdf. 2008 - 10 - 10.
  • 9[3]杨平正,朱云涛.循环水系统及冷却塔优化专题报告[R].西安:西北电力设计院,2004.
  • 10U,S. DOE. A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV NUclear Energy Systems[R]. GIF-002-00. 2002.

共引文献70

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部